Apr 18, 2012

Shakespeare Must Die: Thai Authorities Ban Film Adaptation of Macbeth


Shakespeare Must Die: Thai Authorities Ban Film Adaptation of Macbeth

by Mariana Centeno  /  April 18, 2012  / No comments
Samanrat Kanjanavanit, better known as Ing K, is the director of Shakespeare Must Die, the first Shakespearian Thai film, which is based on Macbeth. Although unorthodox, both Ing K and the film’s producer Manit Sriwanichpoom have called Shakespeare Must Die a horror film. What has been more puzzling, however, is the Thai government’s rapid change from a supporter of the film to a condemner.
During the pre-production of Shakespeare Must Die the Thai Film Censorship Board—which is under the supervision of the Department of Cultural Promotion, a branch of Thailand’s Ministry of Culture—supported the project after reading a synopsis and an outline of the movie. The film also received financial support from government initiatives such as the Thai Kem Khaeng Initiative and the Office of Contemporary Art. Nevertheless, on the afternoon of April 3, the Thai Film Censorship Board banned the completed film. Sriwanichpoom explained their decision:“The Board deems thatShakespeare Must Die has content that causes divisiveness among the people of the nation.”
This contradiction has lead to much speculation on why the movie was banned.
Shakespeare Must Die follows the movements of a theatre group staging a production of Macbeth with some important—and controversial—additions. Ing K included real footage taken from Thailand’s May 19, 2010 military crackdown on anti-government protests in which 12 were reported dead and 60 wounded. Scenes from this conflict have been objected by the film board, who expressed fear about the public’s difficulty distinguishing reality from fiction.
According to the Guardian one of the film’s main characters is a dictator named Dear Leader, who bears a resemblance to former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who was ousted in a 2006 coup which sparked years of political turmoil between his supporters and critics. The censors also questioned the excessive use of the color red—the film’s murderer is shrouded in a red cloak—which the censors claimed is symbolic of the Red Shirts, a pro-democracy group that has expressed discontentment with the 2006 coup that ousted Shinawatra and were directly involved with the anti-government protests of 2010.
On the film’s web page Ing K declared: “A low budget director must seize every opportunity to add production values. There was no way I could’ve afforded such epic images on my own steam. It was cool and it was free! The lord had provided and I could not refuse.”
Ing K also talked about the “excessive” use of red in the film: “Even without [our] specific cultural heritage, red is the universal color of violence. It takes years to get a film made. Why should Thaksin [Shinawatra] have a monopoly on the color red as well as on everything else?”
Power and greed are very sensitive topics to use in a movie in Thailand since such topics could be seen as a reference to the 2006 coup that overthrew the government of the Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Everything related to the monarchy is a very delicate matter in Thailand. King Bhumidol Adulyadej is considered an almost divine figure, and publicly criticizing the monarchy could result in a charge of lese-majesty (15 years of prison).
The Thai Film Censorship Board decided to ban the movie unless the director agreed to edit and cut some of the scenes. Ing K refused to cut those scenes, and she said she plans to appeal against the ban.
Besides her work as a controversial filmmaker Ing K is also known for being a journalist, painter, writer and an activist. Years ago she directed a movie called Khon Graab Maa, that was banned as well, and was described as an insult to all religions in Thailand. It has been disappeared from history.

Xayaburi Dam Building Pact Signed


Xayaburi Dam Building Pact Signed

2012-04-17
Plans move ahead for Laos's controversial hydropower project on the Mekong.
Photo appears courtesy of International Rivers
A caterpillar works on the access road to the Xayaburi dam in Laos in an undated photo.
In a controversial move, a Thai company has signed a nearly $2 billion dollar contract for the construction of a dam on the Mekong River in Laos even though governments in the region have not cleared the project.
Ch. Karnchang informed the Thai stock exchange Tuesday it had signed a 52 billion baht (U.S. $1.7 billion) contract with Xayaburi Power Co. Ltd., a Lao-Thai joint venture, to build the project, Thai media reported.
The Xayaburi hydropower dam would be the first on the mainstream Lower Mekong and environmental groups say it would affect the lives of millions in the region.
The latest contract says construction on the dam will begin on March 15 next year and be completed in eight years.
In December, Laos had shelved plans for the dam pending further environmental assessments, following a meeting by the Mekong River Commission (MRC),  a regional body of Southeast Asian countries that share the river.
Leaders from Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam agreed further study was needed on the sustainable management and development of the river before the Xayaburi project could continue.
Despite the delay, Lao energy officials have remained committed to the project, which costs a total of U.S. $3.8 billion, Bounthuang Phengthavongsa, director-general of the Energy and Mining Ministry said in January.
“We want to build this dam and we will try hard to do so. Our intention and our hope is that in the end we will be able to build it despite all opposition,” he told RFA.
Laos has planned 70 hydropower projects on its rivers and officials have said it hopes to become “the battery of Asia.”
It is not immediately known whether the Lao government had been officially informed by the companies that signed the contract.
Preliminary construction on the project, including work access roads and a work camp, has picked up in recent months, according to International Rivers, a U.S.-based environmental NGO.
"Laos has not clarified if construction on the Xayaburi Dam will stop while the study takes place. Legally, Laos may not proceed with construction until all four governments have agreed. Practically, allowing construction would undermine the study," the group said.
A large number of workers have been employed for a two-year period to construct access roads and facilities for the project, it said.
High stakes
Critics of the Xayaburi dam, which would provide 95 percent of its electricity to Thailand, say that damming the Mekong threatens to destroy the ecology of the river, disrupt the livelihood of riparian communities, and jeopardize the food security throughout the region.
“The government should take care of the environment too, at the same time as developing the economy,” a resident in the Lao capital Vientiane said. 
Mekong dams have faced stiff opposition from environment activists, who say the fate of the Xayaburi project will affect future decisions on the 11 other dams planned on the mainstream part of the Lower Mekong. 
"The ecosystem is already changing, and now the dam will be built on the Mekong River. The Xayaburi dam will be the first; of course it will affect the ecosystem the most,” a Thai resident who lives near the Mekong said. 
“If the Xayaburi dam can be built, so will 12 others. I think that is a big concern," he said.
The Stimson Center, a U.S.-based think tank, applauded Laos’s postponement of the Xayaburi project last year, saying it was the first time a Mekong country had made a decision about a mainstream dam based on the impact beyond its borders.
The Xayaburi project is the Mekong River Commission’s “biggest test” since its establishment in 1995, the Stimson Center said in a report in March, and warned that dams on the river could have a harmful impact on the entire region.
“The negative impacts on food security, livelihoods, water availability, and water quality have the potential to jeopardize the region’s hard-won peace and stability,” it said. 
Reported by RFA's Lao service. Translated by Max Avary. Written in English by Rachel Vandenbrink.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Apr 17, 2012

Time - 10 Most Popular Stories of the Week


10 Most Popular Stories

How the World's Most Exclusive Club Was Born
George Skadding / Time-Life Pictures / Getty Images
Former Presidents Harry Truman, left, and Herbert Hoover attend the inauguration of President Dwight Eisenhower in 1953

1. How the World's Most Exclusive Club Was Born

By NANCY GIBBS AND MICHAEL DUFFY
Herbert Hoover and Harry Truman didn't have much in common other than the office they held, but together they created a tradition of presidential cooperation that would change history

2. Kim's Rocket Fails, but North Korea's Space Threat Is Scarier Than You Think

By JEFFREY KLUGER
A planned satellite launch means Pyongyang has more missile muscle than we knew

3. Man in Nursing Home 'Awakens' When Listening to Music From His Past

By AYLIN ZAFAR
To watch Henry come alive when listening to music from his past is a reminder of the powerful, inspiring, and affecting power of music.

4. Can Autism Really Be Diagnosed in Minutes? One Researcher Says 'Yes'

By BONNIE ROCHMAN
A Harvard researcher says he's achieved exceptional accuracy in identifying autism by using just seven online questions and an evaluation of a short home video of the child, instead of conventional, face-to-face exams that can take hours

5. What's the Healthiest Breakfast? Here's What the Experts Say

By ALEXANDRA SIFFERLIN
You've heard it before, breakfast is the most important meal of the day. Yet so many of us skip it. Consider these easy ideas from health experts who make their morning meal a priority

6. Hilary Rosen Was Right: Ann Romney Is Out Of Touch With Most Women

By JUDITH WARNER
What Republicans and Democrats alike don't understand is that the "Mommy Wars" are largely a thing of the past

7. When Good Things Happen to Good People: 9 Heartwarming Lottery Wins

By TIM NEWCOMB
Three Mega Millions winners in Maryland are co-workers at a school who plan to stay anonymous and live modestly. They're among a refreshingly large number of feel-good lottery stories

8. What are the World's Rudest Countries?

By KATE SPRINGER
Ever travel to another country only to feel unwelcome, uncivilized or constantly in the way? You're not alone

9. Today's Value Shopper Heads to Amazon, Not Walmart

By BRAD TUTTLE
More recent surveys show that shoppers who are most focused on value are increasingly turning away from the world's overall largest retailer to the world's largest online retailer, Amazon.

10. Trayvon Martin Case: Why the Grand Jury Decision Doesn't Change Much

By ELIZABETH DIAS AND MADISON GRAY
Special prosecutor Angela Corey's decision not to use a grand jury garnered much attention, but it still does not indicate which way she will swing.
Go to Time.com

Egypt Panel Upholds Ban on Top Candidates

The commission's decision removes the three top contenders in the race—Muslim Brotherhood chief strategist Khairat al-Shate, left; Hazem Abu Ismail, a lawyer-turned-hardline preacher, center; and Mubarak-era strongman Omar Suleiman.
CAIRO—Egypt's presidential election commission rejected appeals from 10 hopefuls, including the three most promising and polarizing candidates, barring them from the race in a decision that threatens a shaky transition to democracy as the planned hand-over of power to a civilian leadership nears.
Khairat al-Shater, the Muslim Brotherhood's lead financier and strategist, Omar Suleiman, a former spy chief under Egypt's ousted regime, and Hazem Abu Ismail, a firebrand Islamist preacher, will no longer be eligible to compete in the elections, which are set to begin on May 23.
The decisions of the panel of five judges, who were picked by Egypt's interim military rulers, are final, and follow a decision to disqualify the 10 candidates last week.
The disqualification of the most popular candidates has effectively eroded what little trust Egyptians held in the public institutions that will play a crucial role in guiding the Arab world's largest nation toward democracy and dealing with an impending economic crisis.
The top three candidates who were finally excluded on Tuesday enjoy a street-level popularity unrivaled by any of the 13 contenders left in the race. Mr. Abu Ismail called on his legions of supporters on Tuesday night to conduct a sit-in in front of the election commission headquarters outside Cairo.
On Friday, supporters for Mr. Abu Ismail and the deep ranks of Egypt's powerful Muslim Brotherhood have promised to fill Cairo's Tahrir Square to protest.
The election commission gave no explanation for its decision on Tuesday evening, but leaks from the commission were published in the local press early this week as the candidates prepared their appeals.
Mr. Abu Ismail was excluded from the race because his mother adopted U.S. citizenship before she died.
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Egyptian military police stand by Tuesday as a protester holding a placard in support of Salafist presidential candidate Hazem Abu Ismail (portrait) takes part in a demonstration outside the building of the High Presidential Election Committee in Cairo.
Mr. Shater was excluded because of a 2006 conviction for money laundering and for supposedly helping to organize a militia demonstration by Brotherhood students.
Mr. Suleiman, a former spy chief and confidant of ousted leader Hosni Mubarak, isn't eligible to run because his campaign didn't gather enough signatures to support his nomination.
"It's completely crazy. It's completely illogical" said Mourad Mohamed Ali, Mr. Shater's campaign manager. "It's a political decision that reflects that Mubarak is still ruling the country."
The exclusion of the top three candidates does little to change the broad contours of Egypt's presidential race. The axis of political debate in the coming elections still lies between Islamists and political figures who are seen as aligned with the former regime.
Former Brotherhood leader Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh and the Brotherhood's backup candidate Momamed Morsi now step into the forefront in a race against former Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa and Ahmed Shafiq, the last prime minister appointed by Mr. Mubarak.
The decision comes just as public trust in Egypt's public institutions and its road map toward civilian rule had already reached its nadir.
In a meeting with the heads of political parties early this week, the head of the interim ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, or SCAF, urged politicians to form a new constituent assembly for drafting Egypt's new constitution without the participation of members of parliament. The head of the SCAF, Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, also requested that the constitution be finished before presidential elections in May, according to some people who attended the meeting.
The SCAF's interference in the constitutional drafting process was met with howls of protest by the Muslim Brotherhood, whose political party holds a dominant plurality in the legislature.
Some Brotherhood political leaders speculated openly this week that the SCAF hoped to reshape the 100-member constituent assembly in order to delay the transition to civilian rule and to engineer the constitution so as to protect the military's expansive political and economic privileges.
Military leaders said on Tuesday that their new timeline wouldn't delay the elections or the hand-over of power.
Write to Matt Bradley at matt.bradley@dowjones.com

Greek Overhauls Win EU Plaudits

BRUSSELS—Greece shouldn't need more money if it sticks to its ambitious program of economic overhauls, the European Commission says in the draft of a report on the deeply indebted country.
Commission President José Manuel Barroso is to present the 41-page document to the European Parliament on Wednesday. It largely repackages existing assistance for Greece and offers detailed analysis of the changes Athens is expected to make over the next few years.
EU officials had warned that the report, pitched by the commission as a growth plan, would contain no provision for further funds for Athens. By detailing the overhaul efforts and assistance under way, Brussels hoped to show their Greek policy amounts to more than simple austerity, officials said.
According to a second draft document, Mr. Barroso is set to tell the European Parliament on Wednesday that "the people of Greece do not stand alone in their efforts to return the country to growth and jobs."
He will say that the total of funds devoted to Greece, including both bailouts and other EU funds, totals €380 billion ($496 billion) and that "if the Greek people and…institutions embrace the priority actions identified by the Commission today, we can get Greece back on track and make a real difference to people's lives."
Concern is mounting ahead of Greek elections on May 6 that the economic measures are leading the country deeper into recession. The draft urges the next Greek government to stick to the program as agreed.
"There is no need for a new program on top of what has already been agreed" from the troika of official lenders—the European Central Bank, the commission and the International Monetary Fund, the report said. It will be sent to other EU institutions.
The draft also said Greece will need to implement additional fiscal measures in 2013 and 2014 to reach a sustainable debt-to-GDP target of around 117% by 2020.
The paper acknowledged Greece has received less than half the more than €20 billion in EU funds earmarked for it between 2007-2013. That is mainly because of difficulty identifying projects that meet conditions attached to EU spending.
"This implies significant unused capacity to boost demand and investment and create employment in the short term, while laying the foundations for sustainable growth in the future," the paper said.
Among the projects it says Greece could benefit from if these resources are tapped are developing transport networks, exploiting tourism and improving public administration.
"The economic transformation of Greece will not be completed overnight, but significant steps can be expected already in 2012," the report says. "Deep structural reform and the correction of imbalances that have built up over many years will take time but actions spelled out in this Communication should pave the way for recovery and lead to a more dynamic, modern, innovative, sustainable and fair Greece."
At the same time, the report warns that in order for Greece to restore competitiveness in its economy it needs to continue on a policy of deep internal devaluation. It also sets out the immediate obstacles the new government will face as soon as it takes office, including identifying new budget cuts, implementing legislated labor-market overhauls and presenting a "timetable for an overhaul of the national collective agreement for the wage-setting system…by end July 2012."
Specifically, the communication says that Greece should "aim at reducing nominal unit labor costs in the business economy by 15% in 2012-2014."
The document says that its purpose was "to highlight the positive impact that the effective implementation of the Second Economic Adjustment Programme can have by laying the foundations for growth, investment and social renewal"
This is a more optimistic message than the one presented by Jorg Asmussen, the German member of the European Central Bank executive board who, in a hearing at the European Parliament in March, told deputies "there is a chance the Greek program can work."
Write to Matina Stevis at matina.stevis@dowjones.com

The Caucus: Joining Others in G.O.P., Boehner Endorses Romney

April 17, 2012, 11:23 AM

Boehner and McConnell Endorse Romney

4:09 p.m. | Updated House Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio formally endorsed Mitt Romney as the Republican presidential nominee on Tuesday, throwing the weight of his office behind Mr. Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, roughly a month before the candidate can amass the delegates necessary to make it official.
“It is clear now that Mitt Romney is going to be our nominee,” Mr. Boehner said at a news conference that followed his weekly meeting with the House Republican Conference. “I think Mitt Romney has a set of economic policies that can put Americans back to work and, frankly, contrast sharply with the failed economic policies of President Obama.”
Mr. Boehner promised to do “everything I can to help him win.”
Later in the day, under questioning from reporters, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader in the Senate, also said he was backing Mr. Romney.
“Yeah, I support Governor Romney for president of the United States,” Mr. McConnell said. “And he is going to be the nominee. And as you have noticed, the party is in the process of unifying behind him. And I think it’s going to be an incredibly close, hard-fought race. Everybody is banding — bandying polls around, but just look at the Gallup tracking poll yesterday actually had Governor Romney with a two-point lead. I think it’s going to be a very, very competitive election. We’re all behind him and looking forward to the fall campaign, which is actually already under way.”
By tradition, the presumed nominee comes to Capitol Hill to rally the Republican troops once the delegate totals are secured. Because of an elongated primary calendar, that ceremony is likely to wait until May, Congressional liaisons said last week. In the meantime, the campaign is carefully coordinating and rolling out endorsements to show a unified Republican front.
Mr. Boehner had remained studiously neutral even as his lieutenants threw their lots in with the candidates. Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House majority leader, endorsed Mr. Romney on March 4, ahead of the Virginia primary.
Mr. Romney’s embrace of the House passed budget plan, which sets an ambitious course to cut the size of government and lower personal and corporate income tax rates has put the presumptive nominee in sync with House Republicans on the issues they believe will shape the election — deficits, taxes and federal spending.
But on some smaller issues, he has strayed. Mr. Romney has vowed to declare China a currency manipulator on his first day in office and draw up punitive tariffs, a move Republican leaders say would start a damaging trade war. Last week, his campaign said Mr. Romney would not change a Democratic law easing lawsuits claiming unequal pay for women, legislation Mr. Boehner has denounced as a “bonanza” for trial lawyers.




Obama concludes Summit of the Americas on the defensive about inviting Cuba

Obama concludes Summit of the Americas on the defensive about inviting Cuba

By Published: April 15

CARTAGENA, Colombia — President Obama concluded a contentious hemispheric summit on the defensive Sunday as it ended without agreement on whether Cuba’s Communist leaders should be invited to the next meeting, something the United States firmly opposes.
The standoff meant that the sixth Summit of the Americas ended without an official declaration — a negotiated statement of shared principles from the hemisphere’s heads of state — and left open the question of whether there would be a seventh such meeting.
The ambiguous conclusion underscored the fact that Obama, while pledging a new relationship with the United States’ leery southern neighbors, has had little success in bridging significant policy differences that have divided the region for decades.
With the scandal involving a number of Secret Service agents and prostitution coloring the weekend meeting, Obama departed here with the U.S. image mildly blemished and the enduring political differences between the hemisphere’s wealthy north and rising south firmly intact.
“I’m not somebody who brings to the table here a lot of baggage from the past, and I want to look at these issues in a new and fresh way,” Obama said during a Sunday news conference with Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos. “I am sometimes puzzled by the degree to which countries that themselves have undergone enormous transformations, that have known the oppression of dictatorships or have found themselves on the wrong side of the ruling elite, and have suffered for it, why we would ignore that same principle here.”
Cuba and the decades-old U.S. embargo against it, which Latin American and Caribbean leaders derisively call a “blockade,” has been a traditional bone of contention between the United States and much of the rest of the region.
But it emerged here as only one of several issues, including U.S. anti-drug and monetary policy, that together illustrated how far the United States remains outside the hemisphere’s political consensus.
The summit was more buttoned up than the previous one three years ago, largely because several of the region’s most anti-American leaders did not attend. The cultural programming around the meetings showcased this lovely seaside city and the progress made by Colombia, where an array of drug-funded armed groups has faded in recent years.
Santos attributed Colombia’s success in part to the billions of dollars in U.S. aid over the past decade. But the open criticism directed toward the U.S. approach to several issues also underscored the new confidence felt by Latin American leaders as they guide a region that is improving economically while the United States struggles to find its financial footing.
Although Obama has presented the United States as a more equal partner in hemispheric affairs and has spoken forcefully on issues such as inequality that have defined Latin American politics for years, some of his policies fall outside the region’s mainstream. He defended them staunchly, nonetheless.
Many leaders here pushed for a new strategy to combat the illicit drug trade, fueled by U.S. demand. Some proposed legalization — for possession and by regulating the trade — but Obama made clear here that he does not believe it would prove more effective than the law enforcement approach funded by the United States.
“I think it is wholly appropriate for us to discuss this issue,” Obama said, adding that while Colombia is emerging from a “wrenching period,” several “smaller countries” in Central America are “starting to feel overwhelmed” by drug violence. “It wouldn’t make sense for us not to examine what works and what doesn’t.”
New leaders emerging
As the Castro brothers in Cuba grow old, Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez battles cancer and other important regional leaders leave office, Latin America is determining which new leaders will emerge.
A tacit competition has shaped up between Brazil and Colombia, both growing economically and benefiting from a skilled business class. The summit showcased their leaders, who were sometimes at odds with Obama.
Santos and Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff, who visited the White House last week, publicly criticized U.S. monetary policy for devaluing the currencies of developing countries.
And Santos worried aloud whether America is “exporting unemployment” to Latin American countries that have weathered the global economic downturn better than the United States.
“We all have the feeling of the enormous opportunities we have to work together,” Santos said at his news conference with Obama, putting the best light on their differences.
There were moments of agreement, too. Obama announced here Sunday that Colombia has complied with a key condition of the free-trade agreement passed last year that is designed to better protect labor activists from political violence.
The labor certification allows the deal to take effect May 15. U.S. exports to Colombia last year totaled $14.8 billion, and the agreement will eliminate tariffs on 80 percent of U.S. consumer and industrial goods bound for the country and phase the rest out over the next decade.
But the election-year decision has angered U.S. labor leaders, who say Colombia has not made enough progress in protecting union activists in Colombia and in punishing those who commit crimes against them.
In a letter to Obama last week, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka wrote that “less than 10 percent of the nearly 3,000 cases of trade unionists murders since 1986 have reached a conviction,” and that “none of the 29 labor activists killed in 2011 had their cases resolved by a successful prosecution.” The labor group endorsed Obama for president last month.
“We all know that more work needs to be done, but we have made significant progress,” Obama said of Colombia’s labor rights record.
Cuba issue still resonates
Cuba, a historic wedge issue between the United States and its closest political allies in the region, overwhelmed the summit’s final day.
Under U.S. pressure, Cuba’s Raul Castro was not invited to this meeting, and many influential regional leaders, led by Rousseff and Santos, indicated that they would not attend another without Cuba.
Ecuador’s president, Rafael Correa, declined to attend the summit in protest, and other leading leftists close to Cuba, including Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega, did not show up.
Chavez, who usually thrives on the attention of regional forums, was also not present, because of illness.
But the issue still resonates throughout Latin America, evoking the Cold War-era political divide between left and right that Obama on Sunday said had ended.
“The fact of the matter is that Cuba, unlike the other countries participating, has not moved to democracy, is not respecting human rights,” Obama said. “I’m hoping the transition takes place.”

In Africa, U.S. troops moving slowly against Joseph Kony and his militia

In Africa, U.S. troops moving slowly against Joseph Kony and his militia

By Published: April 16

OBO, Central African Republic — Behind razor wire and bamboo walls topped with security cameras sits one of the newest U.S. military outposts in Africa. U.S. Special Forces soldiers with tattooed forearms and sunglasses emerge daily in pickup trucks that carry weapons, supplies and interpreters — as well as the expectations of a vast region living in fear of a man and his brutal militia.
“The Americans have captured Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein,” said Bassiri Moke, a tribal chief. “Surely they can catch Joseph Kony.”
In this far-flung nook of central Africa, the United States has assumed a small but vital role in one of Africa’s most vexing military challenges: to capture Kony and dismantle his Lord’s Resistance Army. For nearly three decades, Kony’s forces have eluded the region’s militaries, abducting tens of thousands of children, turning them into killers and sex slaves, and operating brazenly across a swath of territory the size of Texas.
But in the four months since the United States set up the outposts for the 100 soldiers dispatched to assist regional militaries, frustration has mounted, particularly in this sprawling, densely forested country, where Kony is thought to be hiding.
Local and regional military officials had hoped that the United States would swiftly deploy its satellites, surveillance drones and other sophisticated technology to track Kony’s whereabouts. But that hasn’t happened, the officials said.
Instead, the LRA has continued to commit abuses. Although thought to be severely fractured, the militia has staged 11 attacks near Obo and 13 in neighboring Congo after a nearly year-long lull in violence.
“The LRA has reappeared,” said Martin Modove, the head of the Catholic diocese in Obo. “The presence of the Americans has not changed anything. We just see the Americans driving or walking in town. We don’t see what they are doing to catch Kony.”
The several dozen U.S. soldiers deployed to Obo are providing support not only to troops from the Central African Republic, but also to a contingent from neighboring Uganda, whose continued pursuit of the Ugandan warlord has spilled into the Central African Republic and other neighboring countries since the militia leader was driven out of Uganda several years ago.
In addition to those posted in Obo, the U.S. soldiers dispatched to the Central African Republic include some in the town of Djema, to the north. Others in the region include small groups sent to Uganda, Congo and South Sudan.
Hilary Renner, a State Department spokeswoman, said that the American forces were serving only as advisers and that obstacles to finding Kony remain significant despite the capabilities of the U.S. military. Since being pushed out of Uganda several years ago, the LRA has terrorized villages in the Central African Republic, South Sudan and Congo. The militia is now moving in small groups in dense jungle terrain in one of Africa’s least developed regions, with no basic road and telecommunications infrastructure.
“These conditions help Joseph Kony and other top LRA commanders to evade military forces,” Renner said in an e-mail.
According to Human Rights Watch, Uganda’s military has committed numerous abuses in its quest for Kony in the north of the country, including killings, routine beatings, rapes, and prolonged and arbitrary detention of civilians. Olara Otunnu, a former U.N. undersecretary general, has publicly described the Ugandan army’s role as tantamount to genocide.
In Obo, a Ugandan officer reportedly killed a teen over a dispute involving a cellphone. Another soldier is said to have tried to force tribal chief Moke’s daughter to marry him at gunpoint. In nearby areas, communities have ordered the Ugandans to leave.
“Nobody here trusts the Ugandans,” said Clement Rutebol, the head of Jupedec, a local aid agency assisting LRA victims. “I don’t understand why the Americans are partners with them.”
Renner said the United States believes that “the Ugandan government is committed to apprehending Joseph Kony and top LRA commanders and ending the LRA’s atrocities.’’ She said Uganda has responded publicly to recent allegations of abuses by its soldiers and has pledged to act against those responsible.
Fears of LRA regrouping
The arrival of the U.S. military contingent comes at a time when the LRA is at its weakest since Kony created it in the 1980s to overthrow Uganda’s government. The United States has designated the militia a terrorist organization; the International Criminal Court wants to put Kony on trial on charges of crimes against humanity.
Today, the militia numbers no more than a few hundred fighters. The LRA has fragmented; many commanders and fighters have defected. It is no longer abducting children in large numbers and is staging attacks mostly to steal food and supplies.
“The LRA is in survival mode,” said Jean Sebastien Munie, a senior U.N. humanitarian official in Bangui, the capital of the Central African Republic. “To refuel their insurgency with kids is not a target anymore of the movement.”
When asked why the United States wants to hunt down a severely weakened militia that poses no real threat to America, U.S. officials said the LRA remains a threat to regional peace and security and to their African partners. “In the past, the LRA has exploited any reduction in military or diplomatic pressure to regroup and rebuild their forces,” Renner said.
To be sure, Kony and the LRA are uncontroversial targets. Unlike others wanted by the ICC, such as Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, Kony has virtually no allies because of his unique brand of brutality. In Washington, there is strong bipartisan support for the U.S. role in the hunt for Kony, and in recent weeks, that quest has gained new prominence with the release of videos by the advocacy group Invisible Children that have gone viral on the Internet.
Some analysts say the main U.S. priority in the region is to maintain a vital counterterrorism partnership with Uganda and its president, Yoweri Museveni, whose forces form the bulk of an American-backed African Union force fighting al-Shabab, the Somali militia linked to al-Qaeda.
Since 2008, the United States has provided nearly $50 million in logistical support and nonlethal equipment to Uganda’s military to fight the LRA and nearly $500 million to support LRA victims in northern Uganda.
Critics say such monetary support helps explain Uganda’s failure to capture Kony despite many opportunities. Several official investigations in Uganda have showed that military officers profiteered from the protracted conflict.
“Kony was a golden chicken for Museveni’s UPDF. And he still is,” said Munie, referring to the Ugandan military. “Museveni is instrumental for the U.S. geopolitically in this part of the world.”
‘I am still afraid’
When the U.S. Special Forces soldiers arrived in Obo, local officials said, the villagers sang welcome songs. Some lyrics spoke of how God had sent the Americans to free them of Kony. Today, the songs have stopped.
Of the 100 soldiers sent to the region by the Obama administration, about 30 are thought to be in Obo. Every day, in a building steps away from their outpost, the soldiers hold meetings with local military, police and the Ugandans.
The Americans have brought photos of Kony and intelligence on his whereabouts in the past, said officers from Uganda and the Central African Republic who have attended the meetings. But they have yet to provide satellite images or any real-time intelligence on which to mount an assault on Kony, the officers added. The Special Forces soldiers, they added, never enter the forests to track down Kony.
A Washington Post reporter requested an interview with the soldiers but was turned away. U.S. officials described the American role in hunting Kony as in its early stages.
But the U.S. presence has brought one change here, community leaders say: The Ugandans appear to be showing more restraint.
Eveline Nalayanga, a refu­gee who was driven from the nearby village of Nguili by an LRA attack two years ago, said it doesn’t matter that Obo is home to soldiers from the world’s most formidable military.
“I am still afraid to return to my village. The LRA can attack anytime,” she said. Then she paused before adding: “I am waiting for the Americans to catch Kony.”