Showing posts with label Haiti. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Haiti. Show all posts

Feb 27, 2010

Haiti: Quake Victims Vulnerable as Rainy Season Looms

February 25, 2010

The earthquake in Haiti has created a humanitarian disaster of immense complexity that brought a massive humanitarian response. However, integrating human rights concerns into the relief operations is essential to protecting the well-being of Haitian victims, especially women, children, and other vulnerable groups.

The vast majority of settlements sheltering earthquake victims have zero security, Human Rights Watch learned while visiting 15 camps in Port au Prince and Jacmel. Even though these settlements hold between 5,000 and 35,000 people each, no one has formal responsibility for what happens inside or around them, and security officers are conspicuously absent.

The majority of these camps have no proper latrines or areas to wash. Women wanting privacy to bathe seek out isolated, dark areas, leaving them vulnerable to attack. Most camps are completely dark after sunset, making them unsafe.

Two women told of us of gang rapes and of being raped when returning from bathing in hidden areas of the camp. One girl was raped in her tent. But with no one in authority running the camps, they had nowhere to report the assaults. No one is investigating these cases.

Many children live in camps without their families. While other organizations are looking closely into this issue, trafficking should be a serious concern as cars and trucks stream - unchecked -- from Haiti into the Dominican Republic after dark.

Conditions for everyone living in the settlements, where many shelters are made of sticks and pieces of cloth, will only worsen once the rainy season starts in March. Camps built on hillsides are in danger of being washed away by heavy rains and mudslides. Only 23,000 proper tents have been distributed, according to the United Nations Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance. At least 1.2 million people are homeless.

Access to food is another major problem. The World Food Program's two-week "food surge" did not reach some of the largest camps. Some of the issues include the location of distribution points far from the camps, the absence of security arrangements that would allow on-site distributions, and the reliance on local officials - some of whom, Human Rights Watch found, were involved in selling or otherwise interfering with fair distribution of the food coupons.

A key step in stemming most of these problems will be building safe camps that have basic sanitation and can protect people from bad weather. To establish these camps, the Haitian government needs land. But most of the land around Port au Prince is privately owned. That means that the government needs either to expropriate or to buy the land to allow the international community to create proper camps. These settlements need to be built quickly so that they can provide shelter during the rainy season.

Acquiring the land lawfully and building proper, well-monitored camps can keep the squalid and unsafe conditions experienced by hundreds of thousands of quake survivors from becoming deadly as rain arrives.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Feb 1, 2010

How Nadia François survived the earthquake in Port-au-Prince, Haiti

by Jon Lee Anderson

February 8, 2010


Nadia François walks miles to town from a ravine in the hills in  search of supplies. Photograph by João Pina.

Nadia François walks miles to town from a ravine in the hills in search of supplies. Photograph by João Pina.

On the morning of Monday, January 18th, I set out with Frantz Ewald, a Haitian-born painter, to drive into Port-au-Prince from the hilltop suburb of Pétionville, where I was staying. It had been six days since the earthquake struck, and the city was still in chaos. As rescuers hacked at the rubble, looking for survivors, residents were out on the streets searching for water, for food, and for fuel. In Pétionville, a gas station had opened for business, and that morning a long line of cars formed; mixed among them were men and women on foot, holding plastic jerricans and waiting anxiously for their turn at the pump. An elderly woman came up to the people in line and asked politely for help. The charred corpse of a man, said to be a thief, lay at the curbside across the street, in front of a bank. His head was crushed and his legs were strangely folded behind him, and a small pile of rubbish was gathering around him. As people walked past, they cupped their hands over their noses and mouths because of the smell. A few feet away, young touts sold scratch cards for a mobile-phone company to passing motorists.

Frantz and I were in his black Toyota pickup truck, and we had not gone far when we braked to allow a group of teen-agers to cross the street in front of us. They were being led by a tall young woman in a white tunic and a long black skirt. They trailed behind her as if she were some kind of Pied Piper. As they passed in front of us, she gave us a sidelong glance of polite recognition, and we carried on.

Four or five hours later, in the flatlands at the edge of the Port-au-Prince airport, we saw the young woman and her followers again. She was standing amid a scrum of onlookers outside the gates of the airport, where U.N. and American planes were landing on the airstrip beyond the little terminal building. We stopped and hailed her, and she spoke to us, surprisingly, in English, with a Southern drawl. She said that her name was Nadia François and she was from Delmas 75—a neighborhood five miles back up into the hills. She had come down, she said, in representation of some three hundred people there who were in need of help. She handed us a paper with a handwritten message that attested to her mission, signed and stamped by a Protestant pastor. Nadia had led her group down to the airport after hearing that the U.S. military was handing out food.

We told Nadia and her companions—there were nine of them—to hop into the back of the truck, and we set off to look for food. Despite the rumors, which had attracted several hundred Haitians to the road by the airport, to gather and stare hopefully, no food was being given out there. We drove onto a nearby field where there were tent camps and aid supplies, demarcated with a dozen or more national flags, but it was a bivouac, not a food-distribution point. We asked a U.N. peacekeeper where to find aid; he said he didn’t know. Someone told us that food was being handed out at a factory nearby, where the Dominicans had set up a base, and so we drove there.

The earliest and most visible relief presence in Haiti had come from the neighboring Dominican Republic. When I first entered Haiti, in the early morning of January 15th, I had been waved across the border with a long stream of vehicles carrying relief supplies. There was also a convoy of trucks, driven by soldiers, that were inscribed with messages that the relief had been dispatched as a personal gesture by the Dominican President, Leonel Fernández.

Now a vast international aid effort was beginning to establish itself. Humanitarian assistance and rescue teams were appearing daily from all over the world—from Spain, France, Russia, Israel, Venezuela, and Cuba, as well as the United States. A team of yellow-shirted Scientologists showed up, as did one from the order of the Knights of Malta. Countless tons of supplies had been flown in or were on their way. But the distribution of food was scattershot, and every outlet was swamped with desperate crowds. All over the city, banners and signs painted on sheets asked for aid. Only the patient and motivated seemed to be getting it.

Nadia said she had grown up in Miami with her family. She was thirty-six, “going on thirty-seven,” she said, and had been back in Haiti for only the past two years. I asked her why she had returned. She gave a rueful smile and said she had “been bad” and had had “immigration difficulties.” In the past week, she had become a principal means of support for her community. Every day, she’d come into the center of town and tried to return with food and other essentials.

At the Dominican food depot, a detail of Peruvian U.N. peacekeepers nervously clutched acrylic shields and assault rifles as they tried to hold back a large crowd of Haitians who had gathered at both sides of the gated entrance. The soldiers were harried and flushed, and they yelled when we pulled up to talk to them, as if they had been deafened by the noise of the crowd. We persuaded them to let us through, and inside we found a tumultuous scene: trucks came and went, and civilians who had slipped through the cordon mingled with Haitian police, Dominican soldiers, and dozens of yellow-T-shirted volunteers for Haiti’s Ministry of the Feminine Condition—a legacy of the populist Presidency of Jean-Bertrand Aristide. An official from the ministry was standing in the loading bay of the warehouse, where relief supplies were being piled haphazardly onto trucks.

The aid consisted of plastic bags with the essentials to sustain a single family for a day: rice, cornmeal, beans, sardines, and Vienna sausages. The official wore a decorative print dress with a matching head scarf and large sunglasses, and she spoke intently and continuously on a cell phone. Around her, arguments erupted as unauthorized people tried to sneak through the final barrier to get to the food in the loading bay. A fierce-looking woman wearing a bandanna came in and began screaming that she wanted food. A soldier pushed her. She yelled at him, and he shoved her again. He protested that the woman had been there the day before and was making off with the supplies to sell them.

A hapless-looking Dominican Army colonel was trying to oversee the proceedings. He gave Nadia’s group permission to take some food, and then added, a little apologetically, that he was under orders to distribute food through the Haitian government, and therefore could not take it directly to the people in the city. He led us to the ministry official, who removed her cell phone from her ear and listened as we pled the case. She looked sternly at Nadia, nodded in assent, and went back to her phone.

We loaded the pickup with seventy or eighty bags and secured them with yellow plastic cargo webbing, and then made for the gates. Outside, the throng was bigger, and the soldiers had grown agitated. They yelled at us to go fast and not to stop for anything, because the people would overwhelm our vehicle in order to get the food. We gunned the pickup and made it past the crowd; on the way into the hills, we drove cautiously through back streets. After a few miles, we stopped on a middle-class street, fringed with shade trees, where there was a gap between houses at a bend in the road. A crude patchwork awning of sheets and tarps stretched across the gap, and underneath were a large number of women and children, living on mats that had been laid over the pavement.

At the far edge of the awning, the street ended, and the ground fell sharply away. Below, in a ravine twenty or thirty feet deep and about a hundred feet across, was Nadia’s community, Fidel—named after Fidel Castro, she said—where she and three hundred other people normally lived. (Delmas 75, I realized, corresponded to the street that ran past the ravine and appeared on city maps; Fidel itself was off the grid.) It was a dry, stone-filled riverbed, filled with a geometry of cinder-block and tin-scrap dwellings, one of which was her house, a twelve-foot-square cinder-block structure that she rented for the equivalent of about three hundred U.S. dollars a year.

Most of the residents of Fidel had moved up to the street to sleep under the awning. They were frightened by the continuing aftershocks, and did not want to be caught in the ravine if there was another earthquake. Nadia pointed to a broken section of rock-and-block wall on the far cliff edge; I could see the outlines of an unfinished residential development there. Nadia said that the residents of Fidel had asked the developer not to put the wall so close to the edge of the cliff, but he had ignored them. During the earthquake, a section of the wall had collapsed on top of Nadia’s neighbor, hitting her on the head and killing her.

Beside the truck, Nadia called out for help, and soon a group of young men and boys began to carry the bags of food down into a small rudimentary Protestant church, the Église Pancotista Sous Delovy. The church, built into the side of the cliff, was made of sheets of salvaged corrugated tin, painted blue and pink. The altar and benches were down a steep concrete staircase, at the bottom of what seemed almost like a well. As Nadia called out orders to the youths, the pastor, Jean Vieux Villers, vowed that he would see that the food was fairly distributed; everyone seemed happy with this arrangement.

Fidel was settled thirty-two years ago, according to Verner Lionel, a neighbor of Nadia’s, when the area above the ravines was developed. Lionel was considered a leader in Fidel, because, at fifty-two, he was the oldest man there. Like many other men in Fidel, he was an itinerant construction worker and jack-of-all-trades. He had come there in the nineteen-seventies, as a worker for a developer, a woman he called Prosper, who allowed him to build a shack for himself in the ravine. “Mine was the first house,” he said. Friends and relatives of Lionel from the countryside followed him to the ravine, and then others came. Today there are some eight hundred and sixty people living there, according to Nadia’s calculations. Haitians have big families; international-aid agencies tend to estimate five or six people per family, and some have many more. Nearly half the country’s nine million people are under eighteen.

Nadia waved to the many mothers and babies and children on the tarp and said something had to be done for them. “The thing is,” she said with a tone of fond disparagement, “these Haitians don’t know what to do.” The immediate problem was that the people of Fidel ordinarily bought their water from a cistern truck, but it hadn’t appeared since before the quake on January 12th, and so there was no longer any easy access to water. (This problem was widespread; even before the earthquake, half of the people in Haiti couldn’t reliably get water.) There was no food or medicine, either, since there was no work, and no one had any money saved. These people were poor; like many of their countrymen, Nadia included, they were living below the poverty line and had been since long before the earthquake.

Haiti has been in a state of persistent struggle since it won its independence from France, in 1804. It is the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, with seventy-eight per cent of its people living on less than two U.S. dollars per day and fifty-four per cent on half that. Its traditional exports, coffee and sugar, have collapsed, and manufacturing has been in decline for decades. It has suffered riots and hideous violence and depressingly regular political upheavals, led by a succession of despots and cheats: Papa Doc, Baby Doc, the priest Aristide.

Amid all this, Haiti seems almost uniquely victimized by nature. From June to October, it has severe storms and hurricanes. In the span of just two months in the summer of 2008, it was walloped by Tropical Storm Fay, Hurricane Gustav, Tropical Storm Hanna, and Hurricane Ike, which together left eight hundred thousand people homeless and the country’s infrastructure severely damaged.

Haiti relies heavily on foreign aid, but little of that money contributes to sustained development, and it has often been withdrawn for political reasons. Most of the jobs are in agriculture; as exports have dipped, nearly a hundred thousand Haitians a year have made their way from the country to Port-au-Prince. There they work largely in the “informal” sector: as bellboys, day workers, shoe shiners, and street venders. Now even those jobs are gone.

One day, Frantz and I drove past the Port-au-Prince cemetery, on our way from the small cinder-block judicial police headquarters, near the airport, that had become the provisional seat of Haiti’s government. Bodies were everywhere in the city—lying on street corners and sometimes dumped in the middle of avenues—and, at the office, the mayor of Port-au-Prince and the director of the Ministry of Health had both informed me that they were doing what they could to clean them up. Disposing of bodies was, for all intents and purposes, now the extent of the Haitian government’s capabilities. The Prime Minister, Jean-Max Bellerive, had told me that seventy thousand bodies had been collected by bulldozers and dump trucks and buried in four mass gravesites, in town and outside. One of those places was the main cemetery.

As we approached, I saw three bodies lying face down on the dirt in a gap in the wall. Two of them appeared to be women, one very young. The other bodies I had seen in Port-au-Prince were distended and blistered from the heat. These were fresh, with no visible injuries. They reminded me of photographs I had seen of victims of death squads in El Salvador. An overwhelming stench permeated the air, even inside the truck.

Lying next to the cemetery wall was a young man, drenched from head to foot in blood; more blood had pooled around him on the sidewalk. He lay on his side, with an elbow propped up on the ground so that he could cup his head in his hand. There was a bright-red advertisement for Nino cell phones painted on the wall just above him, and next to it a crucifix embossed within a circle. Frantz said, “I think he’s still alive.” Several people gathered on the median strip to stare down at him. One of them said, “He’s a thief. The police executed him and dumped him here. And those people, too”—he indicated the fresh bodies. “They are thieves.”

During the earthquake, hundreds of prisoners had escaped from the national penitentiary, just a few blocks from the Presidential Palace and the cemetery. The fugitives included hardened criminals and some of Port-au-Prince’s most violent gang leaders. Looters—thousands of them, by some reports—had overrun the Grand Rue, the main commercial area, and other places in the city. The police were hard pressed to respond, having lost half their force around Port-au-Prince. I had heard reports of police shooting thieves and of looters killed by vigilantes. There was gunfire at night in the neighborhood where I was staying, and at one point rumors spread of nocturnal kidnappers who were stealing people’s babies to sell for adoption, supposedly abducting them as they slept in the streets outside. One day, I saw a man tied to a pole, hacked up by machetes and beaten to death with rocks.

The man on the sidewalk twitched; his chest rose and fell slowly a couple of times. A yellow bulldozer came up the street, and a rough-looking man, walking in front of it, directed it toward the three bodies lying inside the cleft in the wall. The bulldozer, amid great noise and fumes, scraped them up into its iron beak and then, in several violent motions, rolled them into a mound of yellow dirt that rose some fifteen feet inside the broken wall. Within a minute, the bodies had vanished. The bulldozer came along the sidewalk and lowered its beak. Before it could scoop up the wounded man, though, the worker directing operations walked over. Seeing that the man was still alive, he waved the bulldozer away. As it roared off, we asked him what he planned to do about the wounded man. He said, “I am only responsible for the dead,” and walked away.

When the quake hit, Nadia had tried to run out of the ravine. She was halfway up the crude concrete steps that led to the street when she heard screaming from near her house. She ran back, and saw her neighbor lying dead under the pile of cinder blocks. The neighbor had a seven-month-old boy. “I said, ‘Where’s the baby, where’s the baby?’ and we saw him lying there on the ground.” She had managed to toss the child clear just as she was buried by the blocks. “A woman picked him up and gave him to me,” Nadia said. “He was covered with blood, and there was also blood on his socks. One arm looked dislocated, and one of his legs, too, and he had a swelling on his head. I was scared he would die in my hands. He kept trying to go to sleep, and I was trying to wake him up.” Nadia went looking for his relatives and found his aunt, who lived in Ravine 75, a few blocks away from Fidel. “After, I went outside and sat, and I was crying, because I didn’t know what happened to my boyfriend.” Her boyfriend, a young man named Kesnel Jean, had left earlier in the day on a bus for Jacmel, a town on the southern coast of Haiti. He had not been heard from.

That night, “after it stopped,” Nadia said, she walked down to Delmas 36, about thirty-five blocks away, to see if her cousin and his family had survived. They had, but what she saw of the city—“a lot of houses down,” and people dead and wounded everywhere—saddened her. Nadia recalled that a rumor had begun circulating after the disaster struck. “The Haitians started saying that it was the U.S. doing an experiment that caused it, because they wanted to take over Haiti. But I know it’s God’s work, because if it was the U.S. that did it, then did they also do the earthquake in California a few years ago? I tried to tell them it don’t make no sense.”

In the next days, she continued roving out of Fidel. “On Wednesday, I walked all the way to downtown and back up, looking for my boyfriend. I saw dead people lying around,” she said. “I saw one kid who had tried to run out of a building, and it smashed down on him, and all you could see was his face and one of his arms. I saw looters taking things and throwing them down from one building that was destroyed, and I took off running, because I didn’t want to get taken by the police.”

It was in those initial sorties of hers, looking for Kesnel and for her relatives, that Nadia had started searching for food. She told me, with a kind of fierce pride, “I never suffered in the U.S. for things like food and water, so I don’t think I should have to in Haiti.” She brought the food she found to Pastor Villers, to be stored in the little Pancotista church until it could be handed out.

It wasn’t until two days after Kesnel went missing that he arrived back in Fidel, injured in one leg but otherwise unharmed. When the earthquake had struck, his bus had crashed; a U.N. vehicle was also in a wreck nearby. Many passengers had been killed, he told Nadia, but he had been pulled to safety by the U.N. people. He had managed to hire a motorcycle to get partway back to Port-au-Prince, and had hitched a ride the rest of the way.

On the coastal road leading west out of Port-au-Prince to Léogâne—an old plantation town that had been almost entirely destroyed in the quake—I stopped one day at the home of Max Beauvoir, Haiti’s preëminent houngan, or vodou priest. Beauvoir’s rambling complex was situated in a shady glade of tropical trees—an unusual sight in this part of the country, which, like much of Haiti, has been largely deforested. The coral-rock wall in front had partly collapsed in the earthquake. A section of his temple and an open-air kitchen had been damaged, too, but his home was intact. Several statues of vodou gods overlooked the garden from the parapets of the buildings.

Beauvoir, seated at a round table beneath the trees behind his house, greeted me graciously. A tall, handsome man with deep-set, intense eyes, he had a pair of huge Rottweilers at his feet and a pack of Marlboro Lights on the table, which he drew from as we talked. He said he was upset about remarks made by the American evangelical preacher Pat Robertson, who had blamed Haiti’s tragedy on a pact with the Devil. “I feel that Pat Robertson missed a very good opportunity to close his mouth,” Beauvoir said. “What is needed most in Haiti now is certainly compassion. A tragedy like this is the fault of nobody, and to look for fault is ridiculous, and it seems to me that was not very intelligent. It would have been more intelligent on his part if he had simply shut up.” Beauvoir was also upset about the mass burials of the earthquake victims. Tens of thousands of unidentified human bodies a day were being bulldozed into the ground without any ceremony, and he wished for a way to bring greater dignity to the process. “We all have a part of God in us, and our bodies should be disposed of in a decent way. The way they are doing it, picking them up and putting them in holes, it’s undignified.”

I told Beauvoir about the bodies I had seen dumped at the cemetery, and he nodded. On January 16th, he said, he had been summoned by Haiti’s President, René Préval, to an emergency cabinet meeting, along with the Prime Minister, the police chief, and the surviving heads of the Catholic and Protestant churches. At the meeting, the leaders had discussed the unravelling security situation in Port-au-Prince. “We decided we had to deal with them in an emergency way,” he said. “Beginning on the seventeenth and for the next two weeks,” criminals were to be treated “as in an emergency.” I asked him if this meant capital punishment, and he said it did: “Capital punishment, automatically, for all bandits.” Some of the looters were taking what they desperately needed, and from places where it wouldn’t be missed. And some of them must have been supplying those too sick or badly injured to fend for themselves; Nadia couldn’t have been the only one tending to a community. Others, of course, were stealing out of greed and opportunism. But this seemed an impossible distinction to make, especially for a beleaguered and diminished police force.

I asked if such license could extend to the killing of a young girl, and mentioned the girl whose body was among those dumped at the cemetery.

Beauvoir nodded. “It could include anybody.” He seemed to think of such harsh treatment as a lamentable necessity. “I personally regret this,” he said. “I regret all death. I regret the many calls I have received asking for help. I regret that people are still trapped in their houses. I regret the earthquake we had this morning.” (Earlier that day, an aftershock registering 6.1 on the Richter scale had rattled Port-au-Prince.) I told him about the young man I had found shot and left for dead, and how it had been American soldiers, in the end, who had taken him away for medical treatment. I told Beauvoir that I had tried to follow up on his case but had been unable to find him. This, too, he said, was regrettable. “But if you want to look for him, I can tell you, go and look in the graves.”

The Haitian government has denied ordering the police to use extrajudicial means to deal with looters. But when I told Nadia what Beauvoir had said, she wasn’t surprised. A few days earlier, a policeman who lived in Fidel had told her and her neighbors, “If you catch a thief, kill him.”

Nadia spoke English and Spanish and Creole, but, she told me, she felt more American than Haitian. When I asked her what her favorite television programs were, she laughed and said, “Oh, ‘The Dukes of Hazzard’ and ‘Punky Brewster’!” Her mother took her and her siblings to the U.S. when she was six, on a boat with other Haitian illegal immigrants, going first to Cuba and then to Florida. Her father was in prison in the United States, and joined them when Nadia was fourteen. Soon afterward, she caught him sniffing cocaine in the house, and he had tried to beat her. Her mother threw him out. When she was still in high school, he shot someone and escaped to Port-au-Prince. Not long afterward, she heard, he was shot dead after a drug deal in Delmas 33—about thirty blocks from where she lived now.

As a child in Miami, she had wanted to be a marine or a model. “My mother kept promising to take me to Barbizon, but she lied, she never did.” Nadia smiled. Life had been difficult. Her older brother, she explained, had fallen ill after a vodou curse was put on him. Her mother had returned to Port-au-Prince to nurse him, but he had died. Nadia’s mother had brought the illness back with her, and died soon afterward. That was in Nadia’s senior year of high school. She graduated, but after her mother’s death she and her sister had had to move out of their rented house.

For a time, she said, she studied “H.R.S.” at Tallahassee Community College. When I asked what that meant, she said, “Human resources services,” uncertainly, as if she couldn’t quite remember what the initials stood for. She had also studied cosmetology, and got a certificate for call-center work. She had three children, two by one man and one by another.

In 1992, she was arrested and spent five and a half years in prison. The charges were for forging a Treasury check and for armed robbery. She told me at first that she had been arrested in a car that had a gun in it which didn’t belong to her. Then she looked at me and said, “I fell in with the wrong people.” After prison, she was deported. In 1999, she returned to the U.S., hoping to see her daughter, who she said was being abused in foster care. She was picked up by police for entering the country illegally, and spent seven years and one month in the federal correctional institution at Tallahassee. In June, 2007, together with other detainees, she was sent by special plane back to Port-au-Prince. They were greeted by Haitian policemen, whose faces were hidden by masks, and placed in detention. “I was afraid, because I didn’t know what to expect,” she said with a shudder. “I don’t know why they had to wear masks.” After a couple of weeks, a cousin came to fetch her. Not long after, she rented the small house in Fidel and had been there ever since, earning a little income by cutting women’s hair.

Nadia hadn’t seen any of her children since her last arrest. Her youngest had been a baby when she went to prison. All three had ended up in different foster homes. Nadia’s greatest wish was to return to the States with her nephew (the son of the brother who had died in Haiti), to be reunited with her children, and to have a job. “I can work at anything, I don’t mind what,” she said. “They say that if you pay your dues you’re supposed to be given a second chance. Isn’t that right?”

When I arrived to see her one morning, Nadia was on the street, talking heatedly with the woman who sold water, sugarcane, and soda from a hole-in-the-wall shop at the end of the street, where everyone from the ravine congregated. Nadia was loudly admonishing her in Creole. It went on for some time. The day before, Nadia explained, the woman had taken receipt of some boxes of Chinese rice that had been intended for her. The donor was a Canadian man whom she had stopped as he was driving by; she had persuaded him to bring food for her and her neighbors, but he had apparently returned while Nadia was away. The shopkeeper said she had already handed it out. “So she claims,” Nadia muttered disgustedly.

When I asked Nadia how the people of Fidel had come to regard her as a leader, she said that it was because she spoke English. Then, harshly, she added, “And because I’m the one searching for help while they’re sitting on their sorry behinds.”

Fidel was not especially hard-hit by the earthquake; other than Nadia’s neighbor and a couple of women farther down the gulch whose house crumbled and injured their legs, it experienced none of the ravages that destroyed so much of the city. But, in the absence of a viable economy and national infrastructure, it was still a hopeless place, a symbol of Haiti’s deep and persistent problems. Many of the men in the neighborhood seemed to sit around most of the day. Some played dominoes to pass the time. There was no work for them, and would not be until the aid money for reconstruction created jobs. Lionel Verner hasn’t had construction work for a long time, he said; he sells cell-phone scratch cards to make a living. He has eight sons and no wife, and he makes twenty to thirty gourdes—something less than one U.S. dollar—a day. Nadia explained that before the earthquake a small bag of beans sufficient for a family meal cost twenty-seven gourdes, a bag of rice about fifty. By now, prices had risen substantially. Verner said that he and his sons usually ate one meal a day: spaghetti or rice, and sometimes cornmeal mash with beans. Since the earthquake, Nadia and a large group of others from Fidel—those sleeping under the awning—had begun cooking a collective evening meal in a large pot over a charcoal fire, right on the street. They wasted nothing. Some of the blocks that had fallen on Nadia’s neighbor had been repurposed as a base for a washtub. Nadia had stored the baby’s disassembled crib.

On January 25th, twelve days after the earthquake, Nadia asked me to go with her to the Pétionville Country Club, a nine-hole golf course studded with flamboyant orange trees. There was a displaced-persons camp there, she said, and the American Army was giving out food. Nadia said she had found the camp after she noticed U.S. military helicopters and followed them “to see where they were going.”

At the golf course, we walked onto an incongruously clipped lawn at the second tee. Ahead of us, spreading out over the slopes of the hillside, were thousands of shelters, made out of every conceivable material: bedsheets, sacking, plastic, and in one case, a greenish plastic printed with the words “Caution: Contains Infectious Biological Waste.” Small tent-shops had sprung up, including one that sold wigs and hair weaves, and another in which a young man with a tiny generator was recharging cell phones.

The aid was being dispensed by Catholic Relief Services, and Nadia stopped a C.R.S. worker as he trotted through the crowd, an Irishman named Donal. Although he looked busy and exhausted, he listened patiently as Nadia made her appeal. He explained that he could do nothing for her until she first went to their office, in Delmas. A team would be sent to survey the ravine, and if her claim was accepted then food could be given. The camp had at least twenty-five thousand people in it already, Donal said, and the number was swelling by the day. Because there were no latrines, everyone was defecating in the open, a major health hazard. There had been three rapes, and he was worried about fires. C.R.S. was trying to cope, but it was on the verge of being overwhelmed.

Nadia nodded sympathetically, but she was relentless. “So what do I have to do?” she asked. Before she let him go, Donal had told her where to get help and supplied her with his own cell-phone number.

At the C.R.S. office, Nadia found a tall, amiable Oregonian of thirty-five, Lane Hartill, who got her a chair and a bottle of drinking water and listened intently as she described the situation in Fidel. C.R.S. wanted to help as many people as it could, he told Nadia; the agency had already brought in sixteen hundred tons of food, and it planned to put people back to work by hiring them to clear rubble.

Hartill offered to come with Nadia to survey Fidel himself. When he arrived, he was amazed that there were people living in the ravine. “What do they do in the rainy season?” he asked. “They get wet,” Nadia said.

Back at the office, a waybill was drawn up that authorized Nadia to go to the C.R.S. compound across town and collect a hundred and fifty buckets of food, a hundred and fifty hygiene kits (buckets containing towels, soap, sanitary napkins, and detergent), and fifty cases of drinking water. Nadia went off on a motorbike that belonged to a young man who lived nearby and soon returned with four small pickup trucks.

While the trucks were being loaded at the C.R.S. compound, Nadia cracked jokes and flirted with a contingent of Nepalese U.N. soldiers who were on guard there. She was overjoyed at the supplies. When she returned to Fidel, Pastor Villers threw open his church doors, and soon there was a stream of boys and girls and men going to and from the trucks, carrying the C.R.S. buckets and water and stockpiling them on the church floor.

Nadia moved back and forth, issuing orders. She told people to line up, and, using a list of names she had compiled in girlish handwriting, she began to call them forward.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jan 25, 2010

Witness to Horror

Ghosts of Abu Ghraib: Mark Danner & Rory KennedyImage by Steve Rhodes via Flickr

By Charles Simic

Stripping Bare the Body: Politics Violence War
by Mark Danner

Nation Books, 626 pp., $28.95

"We got no dog in this fight."
—Secretary of State James Baker after his failed mission to Yugoslavia in 1991

1.

Now that independent war correspondents are nearly an extinct species and we fight wars with fewer and fewer images of destruction and carnage shown on television or in newspapers, it's worth recalling that there was a time when this wasn't so. Before the Pentagon established the policy of embedding reporters with our armed forces—thus restricting their movement and making it harder for images and reports that do not fit the official narrative to appear—war correspondents were more or less on their own in war-torn countries, reporting what they saw and drawing their own conclusions. It was an extremely dangerous line of work. Between 1991 and 2001, forty-three journalists died in the Balkans, which is fewer than in Iraq, where between 2003 and 2009, 145 were killed in crossfire, suicide bombings, and premeditated murders by various participants in the conflict who didn't want reporters poking their noses where they shouldn't.

Beginning with the 1987 election that was supposed to bring democracy to Haiti after the bloody reign of the Duvaliers, and which resulted in another bloodbath, Mark Danner chronicles the even more violent conflicts in Bosnia and Croatia in the early 1990s, the post-invasion violence in Iraq, the torture in our secret prisons around the world, and the various policy decisions in Washington that had either a dire or beneficial impact on the people of those countries. These lengthy, well-researched, and well-written pieces, many of which appeared in these pages, combine political analysis, historical background, and Danner's eyewitness reporting to convey the vast human suffering behind events that can often seem remote.



The title of the book comes from the former Haitian president Leslie Manigat, who took power from Duvalierist officers after they brutally aborted the 1987 election. He told Danner that political violence "strips bare the social body," allowing us to see beneath the surface to the real workings of a society. That is what makes this collection so fascinating to read. At the same time as we are being educated about these countries beset by violence, we are witnessing Danner's own education, his deepening understanding of the limits and unintended consequences of our military interventions.

Haiti was Danner's initiation. He arrived to cover the country's "transition to democracy" for The New Yorker in 1986, just after François "Papa Doc" Duvalier's son was flown to luxurious exile in France in an American military jet, courtesy of the Reagan administration. Danner naively expected, as he himself admits, that a freely held election and the popular government it would produce could break the cycle of military coups and dictators, in which a shy country doctor becomes a homicidal monster, a general with a stutter a drunken Caligula. He came to realize that

Violence is the motor of Haiti's politics, the means of regime change, the method of succession. The struggle for power is ongoing and endless, permeating all aspects of life and implicating any Haitian of wealth and reputation. "If a man does not go into politics," says the former president who gave me this book's title, "then politics itself comes to him." A professor, intellectual, and writer from an illustrious political family, he attained power thanks to the military after a bloody, aborted election, and lost it a few months later in a tumultuous coup d'etat.

History repeats itself in unhappy countries. The absence of respected institutions and well-established laws that a person can count on to protect him condemns these societies to reenact the same conflicts, make the same mistakes more than once, and bear the same horrific consequences of these acts. In Haiti, as a former finance minister told Danner, "The whole bloody business of repression, torture, and killing was developed to stay in office, in order to make money."

There are plenty of other places where this has been true and continues to be true, but such corruption is usually better concealed behind the veneer of law and order. In impoverished Haiti, with its sharp split between a small, educated ruling class that speaks French and the rest of the population who are illiterate and speak Creole (so they often do not understand what their president says to them), these harsh realities are, indeed, laid bare. The elder Duvalier, who ruled between 1957 and his death in 1971, believed there should be no boundaries in administering terror. One ought to kill not only one's enemies but also their friends, and in as spectacular and brutal a fashion as possible.

On Sunday, November 29, 1987, the day the election was aborted by General Henri Namphy, the head of the military junta that had ruled the country since the departure of the younger Duvalier, another stunning daylight massacre took place. Without a word of warning, soldiers opened fire on people waiting in line at polling places. The streets of Port-au-Prince were strewn with corpses of men, women, and children lying in pools of blood. In the countryside, it was the same. As a well-to-do woman told Danner over the phone, "'All this brings back Duvalier, the father.... You see,' she said after a pause, ' you think it was a massacre, but this was just a normal day under Duvalier.'"

American attempts to reshape politics in Haiti go back to 1915 when Marines were sent to put an end to the chaos of internal conflict. They stayed for nineteen years, declaring that the Haitian people were unfit to rule themselves. Americans seized land and created an army and police force that were supposed to prevent revolt and protect American capital. That was not the end. Papa Doc Duvalier received US military assistance during his first, bloodiest years. He got $40 million from Washington and the help of Marines to protect his regime from any popular movement that might threaten his rule.

In 1994, President Clinton ordered American forces to intervene to restore the elected president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, to power after he was overthrown, protect American interests, and stop the atrocities. "Even sending twenty thousand US troops," as Danner writes, "failed to alter the fundamental dynamic." US soldiers did not confront the militiamen who kept their weapons since they did not want to risk American casualties. As for Aristide, he was flown by US helicopter back to the Presidential Palace, from which he ruled erratically, only to be flown a decade later into exile again.

2.

The pros and cons of American intervention were to become a pressing issue once more during the wars in the former Yugoslavia, which Danner reported on a few years after his visit to Haiti. The Dayton agreement brought peace to Bosnia and Herzegovina in November 1995, and almost four years later the NATO intervention in Kosovo and the bombing of Serbia took place. Danner, who spent time in Bosnia during the war, was pondering not just his own experience there, but looking back at the events that led to the secession and recognition of various republics as independent nations, the wars that ensued, and the dissolution of a country that had been known as Yugoslavia since 1918.

What concerns him, as it does almost everyone who has written about these wars, is how it was possible for the international community, and in particular the United States, to do nothing in the face of the shelling of Sarajevo and the murder of unarmed people by the Serbian forces, which the whole world saw on TV. Why wasn't there a military intervention to counter Serbian ethnic cleansing? Why wasn't air cover provided to escort the surrounded and defenseless Bosnians in Srebrenica to safety? Some of the dithering by the United States and the European Union about what to do can be understood and even forgiven in retrospect, but not this atrocity for which there was plenty of advanced warning given to people who could do something about it and who then procrastinated until it was too late.

Danner chronicles the involvement of the United States, beginning with the first President Bush and the failed visit of Secretary Baker to Belgrade in June 1991. Baker tried to hold Yugoslavia together despite a recent CIA National Intelligence Estimate that, according to an unnamed source quoted in The New York Times, said prophetically that the old Yugoslav experiment had failed, that the country would break up, and that this likely would be accompanied by ethnic violence and unrest leading to civil war. "No one can prove that 'concrete threats' or even 'actions' (and one can conceive of many, short of all-out war) could have prevented the conflicts to come," Danner writes. Military intervention, however, was not considered, since the United States was busy elsewhere with the turmoil in the Soviet Union and the Middle East, and with the approaching presidential election.

Danner claims that with Slovenia and Croatia about to secede, Baker's warnings against a unilateral declaration of independence and against the use of force to hold the federation together seemed to sanction force by the Serbs. Still, it wasn't the Serbs but the Yugoslav army and the Yugoslav government—still in place—that naturally would have had some interest in preserving the union.

The situation, at least before the hostilities started, was not as clear-cut as Danner leads us to believe. Yugoslavia was a country that, despite what the ethnic nationalists trumpeted, was not an awful place to live for most of its population and especially for the people who were intermarried or lived as minorities in republics where another ethnic group dominated. They and many other Yugoslavs hoped for reason to prevail and some sort of looser confederation between the republics to emerge gradually. The European Community, however, put a stop to that by going on record to declare in March 1991 that the Yugoslav republics had the right to freely determine their own future. Germany pushed for Slovenia and Croatia to secede immediately, as did the United States a few months later with Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Without a thought for the consequences, they encouraged nationalist leaders and ethnic groups they found congenial to break up a multiethnic country at the expense of those who had no clear ethnic loyalties and those like the Serbs who, although the largest ethnic group in Yugoslavia, found themselves a large minority in Croatia and almost half the population in Bosnia-Herzegovina. None of the nationalist parties favored by the US, including the Slovenes, had any use for multicultural identity. The openly fascist features of Croatia's ruling HDZ party, with its anti-Serb rhetoric, were passed over as a matter of little importance. So was the Muslim triumphalism in Bosnia. Slobodan Milo evic would not have had such a free rein if Yugoslavia and its last government, including its multiethnic army, were not so precipitously forced out of existence.

In view of all that, it was understandable that Serbs would feel threatened when the entire international community not only sided with the secessionists, but instantly rewrote the history of Yugoslavia, making them the oppressors and everyone else victims despite the fact that the absolute ruler of Yugoslavia from 1945 till his death in 1980, Marshal Tito, was partly a Croat and that Slovenia and Croatia were the two most prosperous republics in the federation. The European Community also declared that the borders of republics could not be changed, so that, for instance, Croatia could secede, but not the Serbs in the region called Krajina who wanted to separate from Croatia, or, for that matter, the Albanians in Kosovo who wanted to secede from Serbia.

Of course, when in the autumn of 1991 Serb artillery and infantry encircled the Croatian city of Vukovar and Milo evic first revealed to the world his plan for defending Serbian national interests by destroying cities and shooting unarmed civilians, nobody cared to remember what led to the war or had any sympathy for the already demonized Serbs. Danner thinks force should have been used immediately, quoting with approval a US Army military planner who felt that a concentrated air attack on Serbian forces surrounding Vukovar would have halted the siege; but Danner also grudgingly admits the unlikelihood of any nation using its military at a moment's notice to break up a foreign conflict.

I'm surprised that Danner doesn't mention several early attempts to broker peace between the warring sides. In particular José Cutileiro, a Portuguese diplomat, in February and March 1992 tried to preclude civil war by bringing the leaders of the three ethnic groups to Lisbon to reach a constitutional agreement well before the republics declared independence. The arrangement he proposed would have divided Bosnia into three separate regions with a high level of autonomy and a weak central government, with Muslims getting 45 percent of the land, the Serbs 42.5 percent, and the Croats 12.5 percent.

In his memoirs, the former US ambassador Walter Zimmerman, who encouraged the Bosnian Muslim leader Alija Izetbegovic to reject the plan at the time, states that Cutileiro's proposal would have probably worked out better for the Muslims than any subsequent plan, including the Dayton formula that ended the fighting in 1995. So why did the United States sabotage the Lisbon accord and then go on to recognize Bosnia and Herzegovina the very next day, when its intelligence agencies were unanimous in saying that after such recognition the place would blow up?

David N. Gibbs, in his excellent book about the destruction of Yugoslavia, First Do No Harm,[1] offers a credible explanation. The US was worried about European efforts to create an independent European foreign policy. In recognizing Bosnia, the US reaffirmed its leadership position and corrected its early lack of clear policy. In other words, considerations of realpolitik were behind the US decision.

Whatever the full story of that decision may be, what happened next was hell on earth. Approximately 100,000 people died in the next three years, both soldiers and civilians, with twice as many Muslims killed as Serbs. Danner's detailed account of the atrocities that culminated with Srebrenica makes a powerful indictment of the indecision of the international community and the savagery of the Serbs, who set out to slaughter and ethnically cleanse Muslims in a manner nearly identical to that used by Croatian fascists in eliminating Serbs fifty years earlier. Not that the Muslim and Croats were entirely blameless. John Deutch, then a Defense Department official, said, "One of the reasons it was so hard to have a good policy is how terrible all the sides were." In any case, the Bush White House and the generals were against intervention. Of the two tragedies going on in the world, they chose to intervene in Somalia over Bosnia, regarding the former as a low-risk, high-payoff operation.

Danner asks the hard question: What accounts for the extraordinary cruelty of the Serbs? He attributes it to the ideology connected with a belief in Greater Serbia (of which, by the way, I never heard a word before the fall of Yugoslavia), the near-hysterical sense of historical grievance, and the heightened rhetoric and paranoia about a coming genocide of Serbs (forgetting that the bloodbath carried out by Croatian fascists in World War II was still fresh in many minds).

Danner is closer to the truth when he lays the blame on ambitious and ruthless politicians; nevertheless, his portrait of Milo evic, whom he calls a dictator despite his having to deal with opposition parties and frequent demonstrators in the streets, is unconvincing. As is often the case with men who bring disaster to their own people, Milo evic was an opportunist and a manipulator without an ounce of common sense. His nationalist policy was not meant to solve any problems for his fellow Serbs, but existed solely to increase his personal power and to enrich his associates. Instead of protecting legitimate national interests, he behaved like a thug and managed to squander whatever international sympathy Serbs might have had.

As for his followers—80,000 of whom came out in Belgrade in 2006 to pay him their last respects, many of them ethnically cleansed from Croatia, Bosnia, and Kosovo—they clearly made no connection between his policies and their plight. What they remembered about him and what they still admired was his pigheadedness. He kept saying no to everybody even when it was against his own interests. Danner gives the impression that he was a kind of evil genius who had everything planned ahead. I don't see it that way. It was the Croatian leader General Franjo Tudjman who knew how to plan. He knew you needed to have powerful allies if you wanted to get away with ethnic cleansing.

In both Croatia and Bosnia a lot of what happened was about revenge. As Danner documents in his articles, the massacre in Srebrenica was revenge for the killings of Serbs by the Muslims who used the "safe area" to make nightly raids on the surrounding villages. In General Ratko Mladic's unforgiving, brutal mind, this gave him the right to massacre two to three times as many Muslims regardless of their individual responsibility for what happened to the Serbs. It's no wonder it took the international community almost four years to fully grasp what kind of demons Milo evic had let loose.

I share Danner's outrage that something was not done to halt the siege of Sarajevo and to prevent the mass killing in Srebrenica, but Europe and the United States were caught between two morally and practically contradictory policies: either deploy peacekeeping forces to stop the killing—which would have favored the Serbs, who by mid-1995 held almost 70 percent of Bosnian territory—or seek to reverse ethnic cleansing by bombing Serbs and letting Muslims and Croats, who were regarded as victims, ethnically cleanse them in turn.

Danner acknowledges that the latter course would have meant hundreds of thousands of additional Serb refugees. But he thinks it would have been preferable: instead of ethnic partition, it might have led, if the US had been willing to take on "the task and responsibility of building a new state," to "the reconstruction of some sort of integral Bosnia." This, he says, "might have brought to Bosnia a very different future from the grim 'cold peace'" of the Dayton accord, however idealistic and unlikely, in my view, that may have been. Also, I don't think he grasps the full implication of what he is suggesting. In order to restore justice we would have committed another monstrous injustice by treating all Bosnian Serbs as guilty. In the end, neither the United States nor the European Union could bring themselves to do that.

3.

Danner's pieces on Iraq, published in these pages between September 2003 and April 2009, and written after visits to witness key political events in the country, which I read and admired as they came out, seem even stronger now that they are collected together. With all the disadvantages of making political analysis and predictions on the spot, this is reporting at its best. His pictures of Baghdad torn by ethnic strife and hundreds of suicide bombings, its streets lined with twelve- or fifteen-foot-high blast barriers, and of Fallujah with its buildings reduced to near rubble by Marine artillery are terrifyingly vivid. As an opponent of the war, Danner is more skeptical of US government claims and more appreciative of the immense complexity of the situation on the ground than he was in Yugoslavia. He is good at showing the distance between a bleak reality—a country devastated by our occupation, civil war, huge political problems, and terrorism—and Bush administration officials with their confident view that truth is subservient to power and that they had the ability to make reality appear to be whatever they wanted it to be. The toppling of Saddam Hussein's statue, the waving of purple fingers after the first election, and other such carefully managed images are what they wanted us to see, and not the rest, which they believed ought to remain hidden from the eyes of Americans.

Both Danner and Ron Suskind, whose book The One Percent Doctrine he quotes from at length,[2] believe the invasion of Iraq was meant to make an example of Hussein in order to demonstrate what anyone with the temerity to acquire weapons of mass destruction—which in fact they did not possess—or in any way to flout the authority of the United States could expect from us. Henry Kissinger concurred; he supported the war, Danner quotes him as saying, "'Because Afghanistan was not enough.' The radical Islamists, he said, want to humiliate us. 'And we need to humiliate them.'" For the sake of American prestige and the credibility of American power, Danner writes, the image of "the burning, smoking towers collapsing into rubble" had to be supplanted by the scenes of "American tanks rumbling proudly down the streets of a vanquished Arab capital." This was to be a grand display of "shock and awe" unrestrained by the so-called weapons of the weak: the United Nations, the international laws and courts that the rest of the world uses to hobble American power.

In actual practice, what Danner describes in Iraq resembles what Barbara W. Tuchman called "the march of folly" far more than a demonstration of invincibility. In her famous book,[3] she studied historical figures who made catastrophic decisions contrary to the self-interest of their countries, decisions that were perceived as counter-productive even in their time and for which an alternative course of action was readily available.

To reread Danner's pieces today is to realize that there was nothing remotely resembling sober reflection prior to our invasion of Iraq. Our leaders were sure of themselves and refused to allow UN inspections to continue; they believed that weighing and calculating the risk would only inhibit action. What could careful deliberation, based on cause and effect, matter when one has the most powerful military, spending more on defense than the rest of the world combined? When, following the invasion of Iraq, looting broke out in government ministries in Baghdad, universities, hospitals, power stations, and factories, virtually destroying the country's infrastructure and with it whatever respect Iraqis might have had for our competence, the 140,000 American troops did nothing but watch the growing anarchy.

Similarly, when L. Paul Bremer, the US administrator of Iraq charged with overseeing the reconstruction of the country, made the decision to fire all Baathists from the government and disband the army—thus making 350,000 humiliated and suddenly unemployed people into enemies, and transforming what had been the Pentagon's plan for a quick victory and quick departure into a long-running occupation—no one on the National Security Council or in the State Department was warned beforehand. The systematic failure in Iraq, Danner makes clear in his book, resulted in large part from an almost willful determination of those who made decisions to cut themselves off from those in government who knew anything. As a historian remarked regarding the extraordinarily imprudent Philip II of Spain, "No experience of the failure of his policy could shake his belief in its essential excellence."

The two most disturbing pieces in the book deal with torture and were published last April after Danner got hold of a secret report by the officials of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). In order to monitor compliance with the Geneva Conventions and to supervise the treatment of prisoners, they traveled to Guantánamo and interviewed in private a number of inmates who divulged what kind of interrogations they'd been subjected to both at Guantánamo and in our secret global network of prisons where they had been held. They describe in detail, and independently of each other, what President Bush called the "alternative set of procedures" that indisputably, despite his vehement denials, are torture.

Borrowed from Soviet and Chinese Communists and other repressive regimes, both ancient and modern, these "techniques" were fine-tuned with the assistance of lawyers in the Department of Justice working with CIA officials, doctors, and psychologists. They not only revived the long-outlawed practices of inflicting pain and terror on human beings from the most shameful chapters of human history, but did so with the active participation of senior officials in government who insisted on being informed on an hourly basis about the progress of these "interrogations," and who micromanaged the application of waterboarding, sleep and sensory deprivation, and other barbaric methods on some of the more well-known prisoners.

Since international law (to which the United States is a signatory) prohibits cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, our practice of torture was obfuscated, excused, and pretty much dismissed, not only by the Bush administration and its apologists, but equally by Congress and now even by many Americans, more than half of whom support it according to the latest polls. What makes reading Danner's pieces on the ICRC report even more chilling is that they were written when we still had a reasonable hope that there would be some type of serious investigation and possibly eventual prosecution by the new administration.

That is not likely to happen. The Obama administration has taken steps to end torture and released documents showing official complicity in carrying it out, but it appears to have no interest in any kind of truth commission that would fully investigate what crimes our past leaders and high officials have committed. This is where Danner's book becomes so valuable. It ought to be read by those who still see our wars as moral crusades. They may learn from its pages why so many ungrateful beneficiaries of our largesse are willing to blow themselves up in order to do us harm, and why wars based on delusions only lead to more delusions and more wars.

Notes

[1]First Do No Harm: Humanitarian Intervention and the Destruction of Yugoslavia (Vanderbilt University Press, 2009).

[2]The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America's Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11 (Simon and Schuster, 2006).

[3]The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam (Knopf, 1984).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jan 24, 2010

Sending money home to Haiti from the U.S. proves difficult

Mobile Money TransferImage by psd via Flickr

By Peter Whoriskey
Sunday, January 24, 2010; A11

MIAMI -- Even in normal times, the dingy money transfer storefronts in this city's Little Haiti provide a critical lifeline for the island nation. Here, and in other immigrant hubs in the United States, money passed to tellers behind plastic glass and then relayed back home is part of a flow that amounts to as much as a quarter of Haiti's economy.

But since the Jan. 12 earthquake, just as Haitians in the United States and elsewhere rallied to send money back home, the critical economic conduit stopped working, and is still far from restored.

"It's chaos," said Miami cabdriver Windel Pierre, 41, who was in Little Haiti this week to send money. "A very sad chaos."

Many here, with their relatives suddenly homeless, have been desperately trying to send funds for food and water. But while the companies can perform the electronic transfer, many of the transfer offices in Haiti's capital are closed, and many of those open elsewhere in the country are short of cash because the banks have yet to operate.

Instant Money Transfer, Lee High Road SE13Image by Emily Webber via Flickr

Ginette Clark, 38, a hotel server, said that she transferred money on Friday but that her sister hasn't yet been able to get the cash. "There's so much trouble over there," she said. "Nothing is working."

Similarly, Pierre spent an entire day this week trying to send funds so a friend could buy gas for a bus to drive people from Port-au-Prince back to their village in the provinces.

Pulling the receipts from the back of his cab, Pierre said he first paid for a $1,000 transfer with one company. His friend could not get it. Then he tried a $400 transfer with another. No luck. Then, running low on cash, he sent $330 via Western Union. He thinks that worked. "The people desperately need the help, and I can't stop thinking about that," Pierre said. "But it's very difficult to get it to them."

Even the cityscape here reflects money transfers' critical role in the immigrant economy. There aren't many stores in Little Haiti, but amid a couple of botanicas and mini-markets, there are three money transfer offices: Unitransfer, CAM and, in the Isaiah Check Cashing Store, Western Union. More than one-third of Haitians receive cash from overseas, with a typical transfer of $150, according to a recent survey for the Inter-American Development Bank.

In 2008, "remittances" to Haiti totaled nearly $1.9 billion, equal to more than a quarter of the country's gross domestic product. Most of that is spent on food and other necessities, according to the survey.

Remittances are a "life force for Haiti," said Jean-Marc Piquion, vice president for sales and marketing at Unitransfer Florida. "The transfer services must reopen."

The main trouble for now is the lack of currency in Haiti.

First Solution Money TransferImage via Wikipedia

"The big issue is liquidity and getting cash to the recipients," said Greg Watson, remittance program coordinator for the Inter-American Development Bank. "What we have been hearing is that all of the services are having problems in getting their money dispersed -- and in a time like this people want to have cash."

"We have emergency ways to get cash, but not enough for the demand," said Katleen Felix of Fonkoze, a major microfinance operation in Haiti, noting that the banks have yet to open. "We are hoping the central bank will open its vault soon."

Security has also posed a problem at money transfer offices in Haiti. Jean-Claude Saliba, a general manager at CAM, said about 5,000 people turned up at one of the offices in Carrefour. The company asked the government for backup security, and when no help arrived, officials decided to shut down.

Similarly, some residents are hesitant to collect the cash. "My dad is afraid to go to pick up the money -- he's afraid someone will rob him," said Stephanie Laurent, 29, a customer service worker for a phone card company.

Restoration of the flow of remittances is considered a key to the country's recovery. Last week, in deciding to give undocumented Haitians in the United States temporary amnesty, federal officials noted that the measure would allow the immigrants to work, and that, in turn, would mean an increase in private aid to Haiti.

At Notre Dame d'Haiti Church here last week, hundreds of undocumented Haitians turned up seeking assistance in filing for the new federal program, known as temporary protected status. Several said that one of the main purposes of their work will be to return money to relatives in Haiti.

One woman turned out at the church in prim professional clothes hoping she could get the documents that would allow her to get a job. "Nobody is going to hire me without papers," a relative interpreted for her. "I just want any job because I need to help my family. My mom and dad are sleeping on the streets."

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jan 23, 2010

Destruction of schools in Haiti quake crushes hopes of a better future for many

Scuola distrutta, Port-au-PrinceImage by Ucodep via Flickr

By William Booth and Scott Wilson
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, January 23, 2010; A01

PORT-AU-PRINCE, HAITI -- Of the many things taken from this city by the earthquake, few are as threatening to Haiti's future as the near destruction of a school system viewed across society here as the only path to a better life.

Education is as precious as water in Haiti. The ruined capital was filled with parochial and secular schools built on the strict French model, many affordable even to the poorest parents, who struggled to pay a few dollars a week in tuition. Early each morning, legions of children in crisp uniforms marched through the city's trash-strewn streets to study mathematics, civics, science and a variety of languages, a sign of hope that endured through coups, foreign interventions and natural disasters.

Now there are no schools. Education officials here estimate that the quake erased thousands of campuses, and at least 75 percent of those in the capital lie in ruins. A grim census is underway to determine the loss of teachers and staff, hundreds of whom remain unaccounted for in heaps of blackboards, concrete, desks and notebooks that appear on almost every block.

haiti school and cowImage by :) Ali via Flickr

"Without education, we have nothing," said Michel Renau, director of national exams at the Ministry of National Education, Youth and Sports, which itself is a rubble pile in the city center. "We've been set back very far. But if we pull ourselves together quickly, we'll go on."

The prevalence of schools here highlights their social importance. Nearly every block has one, with many meeting in multiple sessions into the evening. In the quake's aftermath, the debris-filled sites where they once stood are the places that smell the strongest of death. They were filled with children.

The Andre Malraux School once sat on a breezy hillside, and from its second-story classroom windows, a view of the capital spread out below like a promise of opportunity.

When the 7.0-magnitude quake hit, the second story collapsed, crushing as many as 30 students. Class bells had just rung five minutes before the earth rumbled, and most of the dead appear to have been lingering in one room, cramming in a few extra minutes of study to pass upcoming national exams needed to go on to college.

Église Épiscopale d'Haiti - St. Paul, MontrouisImage by St. Mary's Episcopal Cathedral - Memphis via Flickr

"If you don't pass it, you will stay where your father is, you will be a mechanic or a cleaner," said Osse Jean Moreno, principal and owner of the school, a son and grandson of teachers, who opened Malraux in 1988 and has added classrooms whenever he has had a little extra money.

"School is life," said Exinor Emmanuel, the school's accountant and a former Malraux student. "To succeed in life, there is no other way in Haiti but school for the regular little boy or girl."

Now in rooms redolent of death from bodies lodged inside is a glimpse of the wider damage done to the education system and to the millions of Haitians who relied on it.

'By the grace of God'

About 40 teachers taught more than 1,000 students at Malraux, whose campus covered an area about the size of a tennis court. In the gathering dusk of Jan. 12, the third of three daily sessions prepared to enter the green steel gate and begin evening classes.

Stephanie Pierre, a 21-year-old who loved mathematics, walked up the small hill from the home she shared with 15 others. Many Haitians attend high school into their 20s, having begun late or had studies interrupted because they took jobs to help their families. Rosemary Pierre, a cousin and classmate, and her boyfriend, Romelus Daniel, walked with Stephanie.

As they reached the entrance, Rosemary and Romelus began arguing over something since forgotten, but their fight made her pause outside the gate. Stephanie entered the school on time.

Moments later, the ground buckled, and Rosemary fell dazed in the street. A cloud of dust rose from what had been the school. Her mind raced to Stephanie trapped inside.

"The argument, by the grace of God, saved me," said Rosemary, a rail-thin woman with a bright smile and eyes the size of silver dollars.

Within a two-block radius of Malraux, three other schools and a university were leveled by the quake. Two kindergartens, one advertised by a mural of Mickey Mouse, were badly damaged and might be too precarious to reopen.

Jean Baptiste Edme, who has taught French grammar at Malraux for 22 years, said he had just left the school at the 4:45 p.m. bell and was walking to his home, now destroyed, a few blocks away when the quake hit.

"We don't have any money, so the only thing we can offer the students is a little bit of education," said Edme, who has taught a generation of his neighbors how to conjugate verbs and now sleeps in the street. "That is our only reward."

The French teacher said residents, stunned and consumed with loss, did not enter the debris until early on the morning after the quake. Edme said they pulled seven survivors, all students, from inside, but the bodies of two dozen or more remain.

"They haven't even found her body yet," said Josette Pierre, 32, who began caring for Stephanie when the girl's aunt died two years ago. "There's many others in there, and we're just waiting. We want her to be buried."

Pierre traveled to the capital from Des Anglais 17 years ago to study. But she said she had to leave school to work, something she did reluctantly. Even today, she hopes to return to the classroom.

Her savings went to Stephanie, whom she described as a gentle prankster who hoped to be a doctor.

She helped Pierre work around the household, a usually raucous and joyful place that has fallen into mourning.

It was unclear who paid Stephanie's tuition, and chances are that after her aunt died and the payments stopped, the staff at Malraux looked the other way and allowed her to continue her studies for free.

A year's tuition at Malraux was about $100, although the school administrators often gave "scholarships" to the poorest students, letting them attend for as little as a few dollars a month. The principal said he has never received support from the Haitian government.

Rosemary's boyfriend, Romelus, a Western Union employee, paid her fees. He finished high school and wants Rosemary to do the same, saying, "It's just the right thing to do -- go to school."

But without a school to go to, Rosemary does not know what she will do. Like many here, she might retrace her family's path back to the provinces in the hope of finding shelter and work.

"I want to go, but I have no money," she said. "So for now, I'll live here with God's help."

No plans

The owner of Malraux and his teachers have no plans, either.

"We are waiting for someone to come with a big machine to move the rubble so we can take out the bodies," Moreno said.

He continued, "I am a school principal, and I have no big savings" to rebuild. Moreno doubted that he would find an investor because the school made so little money.

"We need schools for the hope they may bring," he said.

The education ministry sits behind a high wall in the city center, and on a recent day, Renau held a staff meeting with a handful of men in plastic chairs under the shade of broad-leafed trees. A legal pad rested in his lap, its pages filled with a growing to-do list.

Renau said ministry employees had fanned into the city to survey the damage to campuses and to begin tallying how many teachers and staff might have perished.

In addition, he said, other officials are trying to gather student records from the debris. He said those would be essential if the ministry attempts to send them outside the country for studies until the schools here are repaired. That could be years away.

The clanking of hammers scored the meeting. Behind him, men worked on the collapsed second story of the ministry building, tossing down filing cabinets and air-conditioning units into a rising pile of detritus.

"Maybe," Renau said, "there is a life to save in there."

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jan 21, 2010

Earthquake aftershock in Haiti spurs exodus from Port-au-Prince

Gang Members Turned in Weapons  in HaitiImage by United Nations Photo via Flickr

By Manuel Roig-Franzia, Dana Hedgpeth and Theola Labbé-DeBose
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, January 21, 2010; A13

PORT-AU-PRINCE, HAITI -- Haitians pushed and clawed onto rusty boats and dented buses by the thousands Wednesday, hoping to escape a capital city newly unnerved by the strongest aftershock since the Jan. 12 earthquake.

The death toll now stands at 75,000 and is rising, according to President René Préval. A sign that appeared outside an open mass grave at the city's largest cemetery read: "Please. The hole is filled. It can't take more bodies."

About 200,000 people are injured, 1 million are displaced and half the buildings in Port-au-Prince are destroyed, according to the Haitian Directorate for Civic Protection. A new Haitian government estimate says homeless people have congregated in more than 320 fetid encampments across the capital, where pigs and dogs scavenge in the same rotting garbage piles as naked children and their parents.

United Nations officials said an exact toll of the dead and injured may never be known because the powerful earthquake was so widespread and destroyed hospitals and morgues, which traditionally track such figures.

The scale of the tragedy has overwhelmed a country ill-prepared to cope with disaster and outstripped the capacity of international relief agencies, prompting an exodus of poor Haitians, who have no guarantee of finding shelter in the villages and cities outside Port-au-Prince.

Haiti EarthquakeImage by United Nations Development Programme via Flickr

At a ferry wharf in Port-au-Prince's Boulva slum, Manie Felix -- a 26-year-old mother of three -- hoped to travel to Haiti's Jeremie region, abounding with fruit trees. But she had no money to pay the inflated passage rate, which was equivalent to $15. "I have all these kids. I have no idea what to do," she said. Felix was asleep at the port when Haiti was shaken by Wednesday's aftershock, which registered at a magnitude of 5.9 and collapsed buildings in the capital.

Outside the U.S. Embassy, Josue Pierre's 4-year-old daughter looked up at him when the earth started shaking and said, "Daddy, Daddy, are we going to die?" The tremor made the 33-year-old Haitian American all the more eager to get permission to fly to Boston to meet his wife. "Something else is going to happen here," he said. "It is just too scary to stay. It is time to go away."

Rayhold Phanore, a pastor, said he saw a roof collapse on two neighbors. "You think everything is done and then it keeps shaking," said Phanore, a Haitian American who is hoping to take his 4-year-old daughter to Orlando, where he has family.

Nearby, in the Cite Soleil slum, where authorities say 3,000 people died and 15,000 were injured, police girded for the reemergence of gangs that held sway there before the quake. Police chief Azistude Rosemond returned to work after losing his wife, daughter and parents in the quake. Now he must cope without 17 of his 67 officers and is worried about escapees from a collapsed jail.

"They were in a tough fight before the earthquake," Lt. Gen. Ken Keen, the top commander of U.S. military forces here, said after touring the slum with Ambassador Kenneth Merten. "The quake is like a kick in the teeth for them."

The city has seen little violence, despite persistent fears that shortages of food, water and shelter will spark unrest. Still, looting remains a problem. Haitian SWAT teams patrolled the government buildings around the National Palace to keep away looters, said police Cmdr. Simon Francois.

"The looters are looking for the government safes, computers, anything that works, and even things that don't," Francois said. "The people are stressed, and that makes it more difficult for us to protect and serve."

Many business owners have refused to reopen because they fear being overrun by desperate quake victims. But several banks opened Wednesday; long lines formed and crowds grew agitated, mirroring the emotions after the morning aftershock.

The aftershock's damage wasn't limited to Port-au-Prince -- the United Nations said that an undetermined number of people were injured and that buildings collapsed in Jacmel, a seaside city known for its international film festival. While crews spread across Jacmel and Port-au-Prince to assess damage, the USNS Comfort arrived but stayed far from shore. Navy and Army divers plunged into the waters beneath the capital's central pier to gauge whether it could withstand cargo and masses of people.

The damaged and sorely inadequate infrastructure is further delaying the arrival of desperately needed relief supplies, and putting more pressure on Port-au-Prince's congested airport, which is now handling 100 landings a day -- four times the normal rate, according to the United Nations.

The air-traffic control tower was damaged in the initial quake, and there is just one runway to handle dozens of relief agency and military flights from around the world. "More people wanted to come in here than there's space, and they wanted to come in quickly," said U.S. Air Force Col. Ben McMullen, deputy commander for the Special Operations unit tasked with improving airport operations. The airport "was running on a first come, first serve" basis initially, he said.

To unload the planes, it was mostly "a bunch of good strong backs," he said. Since then, more forklifts and loaders have arrived, and the military is now requiring flight plans, hoping that will end the hours-long holding patterns imposed early on. A U.N. official said it is unclear when commercial flights might resume.

The Haitian government has signed an agreement giving the United States formal control of the airport, so U.S. officials have had to referee disputes between relief flights. On Saturday, a French plane carrying a portable hospital was diverted because the landing space was full.

"Everybody thinks their plane is a priority," said Maj. Nathan Miller, who helps coordinate air operations. Lionel Isaac, the airport's director, said that crowding has been a problem and that planes need to do a better job of alerting authorities about cargoes and arrival times. "They don't do it," he said. "They just fly in."

Once the planes are on the runway, they are Air Force Tech. Sgt. Adrian Jezierski's problem. "They tell me the size, and I figure out where to park it," said Jezierski, who is among those directing planes. "It's like a jigsaw puzzle."

Staff writers William Booth, Mary Beth Sheridan and Scott Wilson in Port-au-Prince and Colum Lynch at the United Nations contributed to this report.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]