Showing posts with label IPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPS. Show all posts

Sep 15, 2009

Institute for Policy Studies: America’s Bailout Barons

The White House North Lawn in the 1860s, durin...Image via Wikipedia

Download Executive Excess 2009

The 16th annual Institute for Policy Studies "Executive Excess" report exposes this year's windfalls for top financial bailout recipients.

Ten of the top 20 financial bailout firms have revealed the details of stock options pocketed in early 2009. Based on rising stock prices, the top five executives at each of these banks have enjoyed a combined increase in the value of their stock options of nearly $90 million, according to the report, the 16th in a series of annual "Executive Excess" reports.

"America's executive pay bubble remains un-popped," says Sarah Anderson, lead author on the Institute study. "And these outrageous rewards give executives an incentive to behave outrageously, putting the rest of us at risk."

Key Findings

The Bounty for Bailout Barons: From 2006 through 2008, the top five executives at the 20 banks that have accepted the most federal bailout dollars since the meltdown averaged $32 million each in personal compensation. One hundred average U.S. workers would have to labor over 1,000 years to make as much as these 100 executives made in three.

Layoff Leaders: Since January 1, 2008, the top 20 financial industry recipients of bailout aid have together laid off more than 160,000 employees. In 2008, the 20 CEOs at these firms each averaged $13.8 million, for a collective total of over a quarter-billion dollars in compensation.

Wall Street Pay Dwarfs Regulator Pay: These 20 CEOs averaged 85 times more pay than the regulators who direct the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. These two agencies, many analysts agree, have largely lacked the experienced and committed staff they need to protect average Americans from financial industry recklessness.

"The lure of lucrative private sector jobs doesn't just siphon off talent from public service," says Sam Pizzigati, an IPS Associate Fellow and report co-author. "It also breeds corrosive and ever-present conflicts of interest: Why 'get tough,' as a regulator, on a firm that could be your future employer?"

Federal Response Falls Short: An eight-page table at the end of America's Bailout Barons tracks the fitful progress in Washington on various executive pay reforms. Several of these have strong potential to deflate the executive pay bubble.

The federal government, for instance, could give tax breaks and federal contracting preferences to companies that maintain a reasonable pay gap between their top executives and workers. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), in her proposed Patriot Corporations Act (H.R. 1874), would extend these tax breaks and procurement bidding preferences only to those companies that compensate their executive at no more than 100 times the income of their lowest-paid workers.

A generation ago, typical big-time corporate CEOs seldom made more than 30 or 40 times what their workers took home. In 2008, the IPS report shows, top executives averaged 319 times more than average U.S. worker pay.

The bulk of the debate over executive pay reform has revolved around questions of corporate governance, such as the independence of compensation committees and the role of shareholders.

"Governance problems do need to be resolved," notes IPS Director John Cavanagh. "But unless we also address more fundamental questions - about the overall size of executive pay, about the gap between the rewards that executives and workers are receiving - the executive pay bubble will most likely continue to inflate."

"Public officials in Congress and the White House hold the pin that could pop the executive pay bubble," says IPS Senior Scholar Chuck Collins. "They have so far failed to use it."


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jul 30, 2009

Temasek's Portfolio Hit: $27.75 Billion

SINGAPORE -- The value of state-owned investment company Temasek Holdings Pte. Ltd.'s portfolio fell more than 40 billion Singapore dollars (US$27.75 billion) at the end of March from a year earlier, Chief Executive Ho Ching said.

[Ho Ching]

Ho Ching

"We are certainly not happy with the negative wealth added in March last year as well as March this year," Ms. Ho said.

The figure suggests Temasek has recouped some of the losses made at the height of the financial crisis, as global markets begin to rally on hopes that the worst of the downturn has passed. Ms. Ho didn't disclose the percentage decline or the overall value of its assets.

The Singapore government previously said that the value of Temasek's portfolio had fallen S$58 billion to S$127 billion from the end of March 2008 to November, suggesting a 31% decline. Based on those figures, it suggests the portfolio lost about 22% over 12 months,

Ms. Ho, speaking at the Institute of Policy Studies in Singapore, also said Temasek was exploring the possibility of creating "one more group of stakeholders." Ms. Ho said Temasek could allow outsiders to co-invest with the investment fund, a plan that may be firmed up in the next six to 12 months.

Temasek wants to invite "sophisticated" investors to put money into deals alongside Temasek and could eventually allow retail investors to co-invest in eight to 10 years if the test succeeds, she said.

She also said the bulk of incentives to Temasek's senior management has been deferred by three to 12 years.

Separately, Ms. Ho said Temasek's succession planning continues given the impending departure of Chief Executive-Designate Charles "Chip" Goodyear.

Last week, Temasek said it and Mr. Goodyear mutually agreed to part ways -- just a little more than two months before the former BHP Billiton Ltd. chief was to succeed Ms. Ho.

Temasek said last week that the decision was due to "differences regarding certain strategic issues." Mr. Goodyear will leave the company Aug. 15. Ms. Ho said in her speech that his departure was "unfortunate."

[Chip Goodyear]

Chip Goodyear

"This does not mean, however, that we should stop this discipline of succession review," she said. "I just want to reaffirm that the decision was both mutual and amicable. We continue to hold Chip in very high regard for his professionalism and his integrity."

Temasek surprised many in February when it named U.S.-born Mr. Goodyear as successor to Ms. Ho, who is married to Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and is daughter-in-law of the founder of modern Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew.

A person familiar with the situation said last week that Mr. Goodyear's proposals for the company's new strategic direction were considered too risky by some, without elaborating. He also said Mr. Goodyear planned changes in senior management that weren't well received by Temasek's board.

Ms. Ho said Temasek will keep its portfolio exposure to Asia at 70% or more, its current exposure to members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development at around 20%, and its exposure to new regions like Latin America, Africa and others at up to 10%.

"We continue to anticipate opportunities, not just within Asia, but also in Latin America and elsewhere, too," she said.

Write to P.R. Venkat at venkat.pr@dowjones.com and Se Young Lee at vincent.lee@dowjones.com