Showing posts with label online education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label online education. Show all posts

Aug 9, 2009

As Classrooms Go Digital, Textbooks May Become History

At Empire High School in Vail, Ariz., students use computers provided by the school to get their lessons, do their homework and hear podcasts of their teachers’ science lectures.

Down the road, at Cienega High School, students who own laptops can register for “digital sections” of several English, history and science classes. And throughout the district, a Beyond Textbooks initiative encourages teachers to create — and share — lessons that incorporate their own PowerPoint presentations, along with videos and research materials they find by sifting through reliable Internet sites.

Textbooks have not gone the way of the scroll yet, but many educators say that it will not be long before they are replaced by digital versions — or supplanted altogether by lessons assembled from the wealth of free courseware, educational games, videos and projects on the Web.

“Kids are wired differently these days,” said Sheryl R. Abshire, chief technology officer for the Calcasieu Parish school system in Lake Charles, La. “They’re digitally nimble. They multitask, transpose and extrapolate. And they think of knowledge as infinite.

“They don’t engage with textbooks that are finite, linear and rote,” Dr. Abshire continued. “Teachers need digital resources to find those documents, those blogs, those wikis that get them beyond the plain vanilla curriculum in the textbooks.”

In California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger this summer announced an initiative that would replace some high school science and math texts with free, “open source” digital versions.

With California in dire straits, the governor hopes free textbooks could save hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

And given that students already get so much information from the Internet, iPods and Twitter feeds, he said, digital texts could save them from lugging around “antiquated, heavy, expensive textbooks.”

The initiative, the first such statewide effort, has attracted widespread attention, since California, together with Texas, dominates the nation’s textbook market.

Many superintendents are enthusiastic.

“In five years, I think the majority of students will be using digital textbooks,” said William M. Habermehl, superintendent of the 500,000-student Orange County schools. “They can be better than traditional textbooks.”

Schools that do not make the switch, Mr. Habermehl said, could lose their constituency.

“We’re still in a brick-and-mortar, 30-students-to-1-teacher paradigm,” Mr. Habermehl said, “but we need to get out of that framework to having 200 or 300 kids taking courses online, at night, 24/7, whenever they want.”

“I don’t believe that charters and vouchers are the threat to schools in Orange County,” he said. “What’s a threat is the digital world — that someone’s going to put together brilliant $200 courses in French, in geometry by the best teachers in the world.”

But the digital future is not quite on the horizon in most classrooms. For one thing, there is still a large digital divide. Not every student has access to a computer, a Kindle electronic reader device or a smartphone, and few districts are wealthy enough to provide them. So digital textbooks could widen the gap between rich and poor.

“A large portion of our kids don’t have computers at home, and it would be way too costly to print out the digital textbooks,” said Tim Ward, assistant superintendent for instruction in California’s 24,000-student Chaffey Joint Union High School District, where almost half the students are from low-income families.

Many educators expect that digital textbooks and online courses will start small, perhaps for those who want to study a subject they cannot fit into their school schedule or for those who need a few more credits to graduate.

Although California education authorities are reviewing 20 open-source high school math and science texts to make sure they meet California’s exacting academic standards in time for use this fall — and will announce this week which ones meet state standards — quick adoption is unlikely.

“I want our teachers to have the best materials available, and with digital textbooks, we could see the best lessons taught by the most dynamic teachers,” said John A. Roach, superintendent of the Carlsbad, Calif., schools. “But they’re not going to replace paper texts right away.”

Whenever it comes, the online onslaught — and the competition from open-source materials — poses a real threat to traditional textbook publishers.

Pearson, the nation’s largest one, submitted four texts in California, all of them already available online, as free supplements to their texts.

“We believe that the world is going digital, but the jury’s still out on how this will evolve,” said Wendy Spiegel, a Pearson spokeswoman. “We’re agnostic, so we’ll provide digital, we’ll provide print, and we’ll see what our customers want.”

Most of the digital texts submitted for review in California came from a nonprofit group, CK-12 Foundation, that develops free “flexbooks” that can be customized to meet state standards, and added to by teachers. Its physics flexbook, a Web-based, open-content compilation, was introduced in Virginia in March.

“The good part of our flexbooks is that they can be anything you want,” said Neeru Khosla, a founder of the group. “You can use them online, you can download them onto a disk, you can print them, you can customize them, you can embed video. When people get over the mind-set issue, they’ll see that there’s no reason to pay $100 a pop for a textbook, when you can have the content you want free.”

The move to open-source materials is well under way in higher education — and may be accelerated by President Obama’s proposal to invest in creating free online courses as part of his push to improve community colleges.

Around the world, hundreds of universities, including M.I.T. and King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in Saudi Arabia, now use and share open-source courses. Connexions, a Rice University nonprofit organization devoted to open-source learning, submitted an algebra text to California.

But given the economy, many educators and technology experts agree that the K-12 digital revolution may be further off.

“There’s a lot of stalled purchasing and decision making right now,” said Mark Schneiderman, director of federal education policy at the Software & Information Industry Association. “But it’s going to happen.”

For all the attention to the California initiative, digital textbooks are only the start of the revolution in educational technology.

“We should be bracing ourselves for way more interactive, way more engaging videos, activities and games,” said Marina Leight of the Center for Digital Education, which promotes digital education through surveys, publications and meetings.

Vail’s Beyond Textbooks effort has moved in that direction. In an Empire High School history class on elections, for example, students created their own political parties, campaign Web sites and videos.

“Students learn the same concepts, but in a different way,” said Matt Donaldson, Empire’s principal.

“We’ve mapped out our state standards,” Mr. Donaldson said, “and our teachers have identified whatever resources they feel best covers them, whether it’s a project they created themselves or an interesting site on the Internet. What they don’t do, generally, is take chapters from textbooks.”

Jul 23, 2009

Pursuing an Academic Edge at Home

Kimberly Kauer was worried about her 6-year-old daughter’s math skills. Her school doesn’t assign homework, and Ms. Kauer wasn’t sure which math concepts her daughter fully understood.

To quell her fears, Ms. Kauer started her daughter on an online educational program for young children called DreamBox Learning. DreamBox uses interactive games to teach math and analyzes users’ progress as they complete lessons.

“It was really well-geared to her age,” says Ms. Kauer, a 38-year-old stay-at-home mom in Emerald Hills, Calif. “They really tailored their questions to meet her needs.” After monitoring her daughter’s progress, Ms. Kauer concluded that her daughter was up to par for her age.

DreamBox is one of a number of companies, with names like SmartyCard, Brightstorm and Grockit, that are pitching a new generation of online educational products aimed at supplementing students’ education at home. The programs, which parents pay for by subscription, target learners from kindergartners to high-school seniors. The companies hope their interactive programs will draw students wanting to get ahead at a lower cost than hiring a professional tutor.

Tech companies began wooing consumers with educational products about a decade ago, but often with little success. Many of the early products had primitive technology. Today they offer such features as video and tools that allow collaboration. And children, familiar with sites like Webkinz and MySpace, are becoming more proficient at using the Web at younger ages.

The latest educational programs are generally created by teams of accredited teachers and often reviewed further by advisory teams that may include college professors of education. Still, while some earlier online programs have proved effective at raising children’s comprehension of academic subjects, the latest sites haven’t been extensively studied.

A Free Trial

Many of the programs offer feedback on a child’s progress, so parents can judge its usefulness for themselves. In choosing an educational program, “I’m more inclined to go with something that is aligned with state and national standards,” says Leticia Barr, a technology magnet coordinator and teacher for an elementary school in Maryland’s Montgomery County. She recommends starting with a free trial of the program. Parents should watch how their child interacts with the program to get a sense of whether it is appropriate.

DreamBox focuses on delivering individualized math instruction. As learners finish their lessons, answers are analyzed taking into account a problem’s difficulty, how quickly a question was answered, lesson pacing and other factors. Lessons are customized based on the user’s answers. DreamBox, founded this year, has mainly focused on the home market, but says it now is also selling to schools. Subscriptions for home users are $59.95 for six months.

Playing for Points

SmartyCard, launched in March, involves children in educational games to learn about math, social studies, writing and other subjects. Parents purchase SmartyCards, which hold points that are unlocked when a child successfully completes a lesson. Kids can use the points to play Webkinz, Club Penguin and other sites, or to redeem for goods like Nintendo Wii games and DVDs. The company says the site, launched in March, has 200,000 registered users.

Some sites focus on getting students ready for tests like the SAT. At Grockit, students can take practice tests while collaborating online with other users, typically in groups of five. After each question, users can discuss via an internal instant-messaging system how they arrived at their answers. Another site, Brightstorm, also offers courses for students in advanced placement courses.

Among other sites, GoGo Lingo uses animation, humor and casual game play to teach young children basic Spanish nouns, adjectives and verbs, but doesn’t focus on teaching grammar. The site, aimed at 3- to 7-year-olds, plans to add other languages in the future.

And Indian Math Online is a Web-based math program for K-12 students that is based on the national academic standards of India. A team of teachers based in India creates the content for the site.

The online educational industry has been getting a big boost from venture capital firms. Last year, about $1 billion was invested in learning technology companies, according to Ambient Insight, a market research firm focusing on education and technology. That’s up from $850.6 million invested in 2007.

Blended Instruction

Recent research suggests online instruction can be effective for older students. The Department of Education examined 46 studies conducted between 1996 and July 2008 that compared online classes, mostly at the college level, with traditional courses. It found that blended instruction, which combines online and face-to-face instruction, is more effective than pure face-to-face teaching. Researchers attributed the results in part to differing curriculums and the greater amount of time students spent on the online courses.

Still, the studies didn’t analyze online educational tools for home use. Julie Evans, chief executive of Project Tomorrow, an educational research group, says online instruction is limited by a lack of a suitable yardstick for measuring its effectiveness. Students in a traditional classroom are evaluated through standardized tests, she says. But this is a poor way to measure the effectiveness of Web-based education, partly because standardized tests can’t assess how well students learn from each other through collaboration, Ms. Evans says. “I don’t think we have seen good metrics to evaluate that true collaborative learning environment” of the Web, she says.