Showing posts with label permanent residents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label permanent residents. Show all posts

Nov 4, 2009

Health Care Debate Focuses on Legal Immigrants - NYTimes.com

Judge in chambers swearing in a new citizen, N...Image via Wikipedia

The debate over health care for illegal immigrants continues to percolate in Congress despite the Obama administration’s efforts to put it to rest, with lawmakers in both houses also wrangling over how much coverage to provide for immigrants who have settled in the country legally.

Some Republicans favor excluding immigrants who have been legal permanent residents for less than five years, as well as all illegal immigrants. Democrats broadly agree that illegal immigrants should be excluded, but many want all legal permanent residents to be able to participate in proposed health insurance exchanges and receive subsidized coverage if they qualify.

Latino leaders, worried that Congress might quietly cut back benefits for legal immigrants, have started an 11th-hour campaign to eliminate waiting periods for them in the proposed legislation and to cancel the existing five-year wait for Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Under some plans being considered by Congress, more than one million legal permanent residents and about seven million illegal immigrants who currently have no health insurance would be excluded from coverage, according to a study by the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington.

Any proposal under discussion would leave California with the largest population of uninsured residents, as many as 1.4 million legal and illegal immigrants, according to a study by the Center for Health Policy Research at the University of California, Los Angeles. California’s health system has been crippled by the soaring costs of caring for 6.8 million residents with no insurance, a figure that includes about 4 million American citizens.

Large numbers of immigrants in Florida, New York and Texas would also remain without coverage under the proposals.

While generally ceding the fight to gain coverage for illegal immigrants, groups like the American Hospital Association, the United States Conference of Mayors, and the Catholic Health Association, among others, have urged Congress to eliminate any waiting periods for legal residents in future programs and for Medicare and Medicaid. Such exclusions, they say, tend to defeat the cost-saving purposes of universal coverage.

“You can either keep those immigrants healthy now, or exclude them and wait until they get really sick, then pay for it down the line,” said Prof. Steven P. Wallace, associate director of the U.C.L.A. research center. “If you don’t pay now, you’re going to pay for them later.”

Republicans argue that maximizing restrictions on legal and illegal immigrants will save money and prevent health care benefits from becoming a magnet that draws new migrants to the United States. The five-year wait for Medicare and Medicaid was first imposed on legal permanent residents as part of the federal welfare overhaul in 1996.

Under all plans under consideration, immigrants who are excluded from new programs, including illegal immigrants, would still be required to buy health insurance.

In September, Representative Joe Wilson, Republican of South Carolina, caused a furor during a joint session of Congress when he accused President Obama of lying about whether Democratic health proposals would cover illegal immigrants. Since then, battles over health care for immigrants have been waged less openly, in closed-door negotiations and dueling amendments in committee. With Democratic leaders in the House and Senate pushing to move bills to the floor in coming days, lawmakers from both parties are working to line up immigration amendments for full debate.

There is broad agreement in Washington on barring illegal immigrants from taxpayer-financed coverage. White House officials have also said that illegal immigrants should be excluded from buying coverage through insurance exchanges that are proposed to increase competition.

Instead, the debate has been over measures to verify applicants’ citizenship status. Both the Senate and House bills now call for relatively simple proof of identity, like a driver’s license or Social Security card, lawmakers said.

Representative Nathan Deal of Georgia, the senior Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health, said he would try to offer an amendment to require a second document to verify immigration or citizenship status. Mr. Deal accused the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi of California, of leaving loopholes that would allow “illegal aliens to slip in through the cracks.”
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Aug 14, 2009

English Still 1st Language

Aug 14, 2009

It will be decisive for career advancement for all, says MM Lee
By Clarissa Oon & Goh Chin Lian

ENGLISH will remain Singapore's master language even as the country nurtures more bilingual talents who can do business with China, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew said on Thursday. 'The command of English is a decisive factor for the career path and promotion prospects of all Singaporeans.

'For Chinese Singaporeans and those who want to study Chinese, Mandarin will be an added economic advantage with a thriving economy in China for many years to come,' he said.

Even new residents from China know they will not go far without an adequate grasp of English, he added. 'And they are pushing their children to master English, otherwise they will be disadvantaged in getting places in our good schools and universities, and in getting scholarships and eventually jobs.'

However, he drew the line at making it a requirement for permanent residents and new citizens to be fluent in English. 'We cannot make (the requirements for residency) so onerous that they will not come, for example, by requiring permanent residents or new citizens to be fluent in English, which even some existing citizens are not.'

His remarks at a constituency dinner follow a recent debate in The Straits Times Forum pages on whether Mandarin is slowly replacing English as the language on the streets, and its consequences for Singapore's multiracial society.

One ST reader, Ms Amy Loh, wrote how Geylang has evolved from a racially mixed, multilingual area into an enclave for new residents from China, with a growing prevalence of Chinese-only shop signs.

Another letter writer, Mr Samuel Owen, said it is becoming increasingly difficult to order in English in some Chinese restaurants and shops because many workers from China cannot speak English. While agreeing that Mandarin proficiency was important to Singapore society, Mr Owen urged the Government to strike a balance between that and English as a lingua franca.

MM Lee called on Singaporeans to give the new arrivals from China some time to adapt to life here. 'It is not easy to adjust to a different society, multiracial, multilingual, multi-religious, with different customs and ways of life,' he said.

People also need to be circumspect about the Government encouraging Singaporeans to speak more Mandarin and take scholarships to study in China's top universities

Said MM Lee: 'Do not be misled by the emphasis on Chinese language and culture... It does not mean we are displacing English as our working and common language, our first language.'

clare@sph.com.sg