Jul 24, 2009

Northern Supply Network for Afghanistan Hits Snags

Deirdre Tynan: 7/23/09

The Northern Distribution Network, an American-assembled logistical pipeline designed to ease and expand the flow of supplies to coalition forces in Afghanistan, is off to a lackluster start.

The land routes for the delivery of non-military goods from Europe to Afghanistan via Central Asia provided just over 250 containers between June 5 and July 14. That total is far short of the number originally envisioned by military planners. During a Senate hearing in March, Gen. Duncan McNabb, the head of TRANSCOM, the military's transport wing, predicted that the NDN would transport "hundreds of containers" per day.

The existing rail route, which begins in Riga, Latvia, and ends at border points in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, appears to be experiencing bottlenecks and other problems. On June 5, TRANSCOM officials told EurasiaNet, "We have shipped roughly 750 containers of construction material and other general supplies for US forces in Afghanistan through the NDN, which includes the original 'proof of concept' shipment of about 200 containers. "

"With the appropriate transit agreements in place, the US Transportation Command began using existing rail and road infrastructure in mid-May," the Transcom statement added. "It is important to note that no additional construction was necessary and the NDN utilizes commercial companies from origination to destination."

On July 14, TRANSCOM said, "For obvious operational security reasons, we cannot provide geographic and time-sensitive specifics of moving military cargo. But to update information previously provided, the US has shipped more than 1,000 containers of non-lethal cargo, such as construction materials and other general supplies, along the Northern Distribution Network."

In June and July, according to publicly available data, only seven containers a day on average were arriving in Afghanistan via the NDN. A commercial source, speaking on condition of anonymity, characterized the performance as "ridiculous." Railway experts have also questioned whether the Uzbek rail route, which crosses the Afghan border at Termez-Hairaton, is capable of handling the amount of traffic envisioned by the US military and its allies.

David Brice, an international rail consultant who made recommendations on upgrading the capacity of Hairatan two years ago, said the depot remains under-equipped to deal with a large volume of traffic. "There will certainly be a capacity problem in the Termez-Hairatan section, which two years ago was handling its full capacity of three or four trains daily without the US traffic," Brice said.

"Three-quarters of the terminal area was disused and the working area very badly equipped for its task," he told EurasiaNet in an interview. "The ideal route for this traffic would be deep sea via Bandar Abbas and the new Iranian rail line being built from Sangan to Herat. It's a massive problem, though, due to the current political tension between the United States and Iran."

Given the complexities of overland operations, an air-transit deal for arms and military equipment, struck by Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev in Moscow in early July, appears to be an important breakthrough. However, America's partners in the region say similar arrangements with the United States have not been negotiated.

Daniyar Mukataev, a spokesman for the Kazakh Ministry of Transport and Communications said, "There are no agreements or talks between Kazakhstan and the United States on the transit of military cargoes through the territory of Kazakhstan. After reaching agreement with Russia, they now have to talk with Kazakhstan and then with Uzbekistan on the transit of military cargoes. But for the moment the agreement with Russia is just empty words."

When EurasiaNet asked the US State Department if attempts were being made to secure military transit agreements with the Central Asian states, the press office did not respond directly to the question, referring instead to Under Secretary of State William Burn's remarks publicized during his early July trip to Central Asia. Burns told reporters in Ashgabat, Astana, Bishkek and Tashkent, that Washington looked forward to "new ways of working together."

Some regional observers suggest the United States may have underestimated the complexities, both political and logistical, of establishing the NDN. "We have to realize that this network implies crossing of the borders of several states and every transit country is looking out for its own material interests," said Andrei Grozin, the director of the Central Asia Department at the CIS Institute in Moscow.

"Frankly speaking, this is one of the main reasons why the system is not set up properly and not working well," Grozin continued. "There are of course objective reasons such as the complexity of the system itself. But, mostly it's all about the borders, the financial interests of the transit countries, and corruption in these countries."

Central Asian leaders publicly express concern about the security threats originating from Afghanistan, but, although they don't say so openly, the NDN is also seen as a lucrative opportunity, Grozin said. "The United States understands that for solving its geopolitical and other problems, it has to pay," he added.

But many experts are asking: is Washington overpaying? Several indicators would seem to suggest that the Pentagon's tendency to throw money at the problem is not producing desired results. Not only is the rail network not delivering as expected, financially speaking it's shaping up as something of a boondoggle.

Russian and Uzbek companies are reorganizing their structures to take maximum advantage of the Pentagon's commercial approach to the NDN. In a move designed to get the network up and running quickly, defense officials eased tender rules to allow for lucrative contracts to be granted with no competitive oversight. That has seemed to stimulate a feeding frenzy among regional transport entities.

Russian Railways, for example, has confirmed to EurasiaNet that it is seeking a grant from the US government to upgrade the Termez-Galaba-Hairaton border crossing between Uzbekistan and Afghanistan.

A spokesperson for Russian Railways said on July 9, "We can confirm that Russian Railways seriously addresses the issue of modernization at Galaba-Hairaton on the Uzbek-Afghan border to transit American goods from Riga [Latvia] to the border with Afghanistan. Also, a proposal was sent to Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia on the need to involve US participation in the financing of the widening [of the narrow gauge tracks] at Galaba-Hairaton on the Uzbek-Afghan border."

Neither the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs nor the US State Department would elaborate on the information provided by Russian Railways.

Editor's Note: Deirdre Tynan is a freelance journalist who specializes in Central Asian affairs.

Rangoon Accounts for Over 3,700 Dengue Patients Annually

by Myo Thein
Friday, 24 July 2009 20:21

Rangoon (Mizzima) –There were over 3,700 dengue fever patients annually in Rangoon Division alone, of whom about 30 patients died, statistics released by the Burmese Ministry of Health said.

The statistics compiled by the Ministry of Health said 18,568 patients were afflicted with dengue fever in five years from 2004 to 2009, of whom 151 died. The rate of affliction by the virus and death was the highest in the monsoon season - June, July and August, the statistics said.

The highest number of dengue patients recorded was in 2005. There were 5,621 cases and 40 died. In 2007, the number of cases dropped to 4,948 but 54 died from dengue. It is the highest death rate during these five years.

The statistics said there were 838 dengue patients between January 1 to June 23, 2009, of whom six died.

Among 45 townships in Rangoon Division, the densely populated and suburban areas such as Thaketa, Thingangyun, Tamwe, Hlinetharyar, Hlegu, Taikgyi and Shwepyithar have the highest rate of dengue fever cases annually.

This year too, the townships in the outskirts have the highest incidence of dengue in Rangoon Division indicating that the healthcare system in these townships is poor.

The statistics is updated till June 23 but the highest incidence is in June during the six-month period with 349 cases and four deaths reported.

Some have cast their doubts on the statistics compiled by the ministry as they think the figure does not reflect the reality.

A doctor from the Health Ministry admitted that there are flaws and weaknesses in compiling the dengue fever statistics based on local dispensary units, which are incomplete and conceal some facts and figures.

Though the highest incidence is yet to be collected for this year, it will not be less than the 2008 rate of incidence and deaths, he said.

The incidence of dengue fever cases in Rangoon from 2004 till date:

Year cases reported / death

2004 2,865/ 8
2005 5,621/ 40
2006 1,530/ 18
2007 4,948/ 54
2008 3,604/ 31
2009 ( till June 23) 838/ 6

Asia Welcomes Return of US

Following years of relative neglect by Washington, Mrs Clinton (center) signed a landmark friendship pact with the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on the Thai resort island of Phuket. --PHOTO: AP

BANGKOK - EAST Asian nations will broadly welcome US moves to reengage with the region, with the world's most powerful country offering a counterweight to China's growing clout, analysts and diplomats said.

Suspicions about China's hegemonic aims have also added to satisfaction at Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's announcement during the region's biggest security forum this week that the 'United States is back'.

Following years of relative neglect by Washington, Mrs Clinton signed a landmark friendship pact with the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on the Thai resort island of Phuket.

While communist Vietnam and Laos and former communist Cambodia may have reservations about the increased US involvement, staunch allies such as Indonesia, Thailand and Singapore are glad to see Washington back in play, analysts said.

'The United States does not want to be perceived to be ceding influence in the region,' John Harrison, a security analyst at Singapore's Nanyang Technological University, told AFP.

Singapore Foreign Minister George Yeo said in his opening remarks to Mrs Clinton on Wednesday that the United States is the 'key pillar for stability in the region in the 21st century'.

'The US is therefore an integral part of our past, our present and our future,' he said, adding that the region's countries 'appreciate the gestures you have made.' These included actually attending the broader, 27-member ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) that also groups the United States, China, Japan, Russia, South and North Korea and others - her predecessor Condoleezza Rice missed two.

Philippine Foreign Secretary Alberto Romulo said that the signing of the treaty of amity and understanding on Wednesday - six years after China inked the pact - was a 'very positive and affirmative sign.'

'This means they (Washington) will get engaged with all the issues pertaining not only to ASEAN but to northeast Asia and Asia. The US wants to get engaged and therefore this is good,' he said. -- AFP

N.Korean Allies Join Test Protest

Writer: ACHARA ASHAYAGACHAT AND THANIDA TANSUBHAPOL
Published: 24/07/2009 at 12:00 AM

PHUKET : Russia and China have joined the US in pressuring North Korea to abandon its nuclear ambitions, following Pyongyang's recent ballistic missile tests.

See no evil: Mrs Clinton and North Korean delegate Pak Kun-gwang ignore each other at the Phuket meeting.

Normally counting themselves as Pyongyang's allies, Russia and China expressed concern about the nuclear missile tests at the Asean Regional Forum yesterday.

The North Korean nuclear issue dominated security issues at talks held to wrap up the week-long meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

The ARF urged North Korea to return to the six-party talks to end the regional nuclear threat, but North Korea immediately rejected the call.

The meeting also urged members of the United Nations to implement the UN Security Council's resolution to impose sanctions on North Korea.

The ARF would look at what it could do to promote peace and stability on the Korean peninsula, Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya said after the meeting.

Asean diplomatic sources said even Russia and China shared international concern about the issue.

But in a compromising note, China said it hoped sanctions against Pyongyang would not affect North Korean people, and that the six-nation talks could resume, the sources said.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said North Korea faced strong international opposition over its missile testing programme.

"There is no place to go for North Korea as they have no friends left," Mrs Clinton said.

"There is a convergence of views that we are prepared to work with North Korea, but that North Korea has to change its behaviour," she said.

But Ri Hung-sik, who led the North Korean delegation at the meeting, said Pyongyang would not return to the negotiating table until the US changed its anti-North Korea attitude.

The six-party talks comprise China, North Korea, South Korea, Japan, Russia and the US.

Earlier, North Korea downgraded its representative attending the ARF from ambassador-at-large Pak Kun-gwang to Mr Ri, who is director-general of the International Organisations Department. It was the third time Pyongyang had sent a low-level representative to the ARF since 2000.

North Korea's insistence its position should be reflected in the ARF statement forced participants to delay issuing it for two hours.

The ARF members also called for joint efforts to fight terrorists and said the July 17 hotel bombings in Jakarta were a reminder terrorism was still a threat to the region.

Malaysian Foreign Minister Anifah Aman said in addressing the terrorism problem, people should avoid singling out any country, race, religion or ethnicity.

"If terrorism is associated with religion, it will create animosity," Mr Anifah said.

The meeting also pledged to promote democracy and human rights in Burma, Mr Kasit said.

Burma is under pressure to release National League for Democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners to pave the way for national reconciliation before the country holds general elections next year.

U.S. Forces 'Have Plans' for N.Korea After Kim Jong-il

The U.S. "has plans" in the event of trouble in North Korea following the death of ailing leader Kim Jong-il, the commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, Adm. Timothy Keating, claimed Wednesday. "I can tell you that we have plans with the United States Forces Korea and others in place if the president tells us to execute those plans, in the event of some uncertain succession in the North," Keating told reporters at the U.S. Defense Department.

But he added, "I don't think it is axiomatic that the departure of Kim Jong-il means a national security crisis. We would hope it wouldn't. But we are going to be prepared if it does mean that."

The admiral declined to go into detail. "We are prepared to execute a wide range of options in concert with allies in South Korea and in discussions through [the Department of] State, which would have the lead, with countries in the region and internationally if necessary."

He added Kim Jong-il "has clearly suffered some change of health. Is it the result of a stroke? Is that change the result of a stroke? Is there some larger issue at stake? I don't know... He's a different man today than he was a year ago, physically, in appearance."

This was the first time the commander of U.S. forces on Korean Peninsula in case of a sudden change in North Korea, made public remarks about a contingency plan for Kim's death.

On July 15, Michael Nacht, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Global Security Affairs, said the department is "developing a scenario for the future of North Korea."

Michael O'Hanlon of the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington, in a report in June said in the event of North Korean regime collapse, South Korean forces can implement tasks to maintain peace and reconstruct the North, but that the U.S. forces need to advance into North Korea if its nuclear materials, a serious threat to U.S. national security, pose a problem. In that case, the U.S. must send a clear message to China including promising to withdraw from the North Korean territory as soon as possible, he added.

englishnews@chosun.com / Jul. 24, 2009 09:33 KST

Kyrgyz President Re-elected Amid Charges of Widespread Fraud


24 July 2009


Kyrgyz election officials dump ballots onto a table to begin the vote count at a polling station in Bishkek, 23 Jul 2009
Kyrgyz election officials dump ballots onto a table to begin the vote count at a polling station in Bishkek, 23 Jul 2009
International monitors are criticizing Kyrgyzstan's presidential election Friday, even as the country's election commission claims President Kurmanbek Bakijev is headed for a landslide win.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, OSCE, says Thursday's election was marred by ballot-box stuffing, voter list inaccuracies and evidence of multiple voting. It also accused President Bakijev of using government resources to ensure his victory.

The preliminary report by Europe's top security organization may bolster claims by the main opposition candidate, former Prime Minister Almazbek Atambayev, who says the election was a sham.

Before the polls closed Thursday, Mr. Atambayev said the election was rigged and called for a rerun. Another presidential candidate, Zhenishbek Nazaraliyev, also quit while the voting was under way.

Kyrgyzstan's elections commission said Friday that Mr. Bakijev led the race by 86 percent, with about two-thirds of the ballots counted.

The commission insists the results are valid.

The United States has a strong interest in the central Asian country, which hosts a U.S. air base that supplies American and NATO troops in nearby Afghanistan.

Russia has recently given Kyrgyzstan about $2 billion in aid in what analysts say is an attempt to wield influence in Kyrgyzstan.

President Bakiyev took power in 2005 after violent street protests forced his predecessor, Askar Akayev, to resign.

Iraqi PM Hints He is Open to Longer US Stay


24 July 2009

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has hinted that he is open to the presence of U.S. troops beyond December 31, 2011, a firm deadline set by both countries for the withdrawal of all American soldiers from Iraq.

Speaking in Washington Thursday, Mr. Maliki suggested that the withdrawal deadline may be reconsidered if "Iraqi forces required further training and further support."

The Iraqi leader spoke to an audience in Arabic and according to an interpreter's translation said Iraq will consider the deadline "based on the needs of Iraq."

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Maliki stood by President Barack Obama at the White House as Mr. Obama said despite "tough days" ahead for Iraq, the United States is on schedule to withdraw all of its troops from Iraq by the end of 2011.

Mr. Maliki is scheduled for more talks in Washington Friday, when he will meet with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden.

On Thursday, the Iraqi prime minister met with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who vowed to speed up U.S. military sales to Iraq to help the country improve its security forces more quickly.

U.S. combat troops withdrew from Iraqi cities on June 30 and transferred security responsibilities in those areas to Iraqi forces.

The United States still has about 130,000 troops in Iraq.

Some information for this report was provided by AFP, AP and Reuters.

A Better Way for Afghan Women than War

posted by Katrina vanden Heuvel on 07/21/2009

Earlier this year, I challenged the notion put forth by some feminists and human rights groups that a US military presence in Afghanistan is both justified and necessary in order to protect Afghan women and girls. I interviewed Kavita Ramdas, President of the Global Fund for Women, who discussed how the women of Afghanistan are hardly united on the need for the US military in their country, and many make a strong case that the war in Afghanistan and US occupation in fact exacerbates the plight of women.

The crucial question of how best to help Afghan women and girls is once again being raised within the peace movement and the media. The Feminist Majority Foundation (FMF)--an invaluable organization dedicated to women's equality, reproductive health, and non-violence-- has made the decision to essentially support the Obama administration's escalation as necessary in order to protect women and girls from the Taliban and enable a "significant redevelopment effort." (Coincidentally, columnist Tom Friedman, who has opposed escalation, is also rethinking his position based on the idea that our presence will create greater opportunities and protection for women and girls.)

While I admire FMF for much of its work, including its fight against the oppression of Afghan women and girls since 1996--and I acknowledge that these are complex and emotional issues--I disagree with the organization's position here. I also take issue with an op-ed by FMF president Eleanor Smeal and board member Helen Cho that characterizes those who advocate for a US withdrawal as wanting to "just walk away", or "abandon the women and girls of Afghanistan." These criticisms are reminiscent of the "cut and run" accusations against a peace and justice movement that wisely opposed the disastrous occupation of Iraq (and FMF was a part of that movement).

In fact, a planned withdrawal doesn't at all mean ending a US role in the security and reconstruction of Afghanistan. It means ramping up wiser alternatives that should have been embraced post-9/11 in the fight against terrorist organizations: intelligence cooperation, expert police work, smart diplomacy, targeted aid (including maternal health care, education, and reconstruction funds), and a regional, negotiated settlement that involves Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, China, Russia, and Iran. It means international-led peacekeeping forces. In no way whatsoever is this approach tantamount to abandoning the Afghan people or just walking away from them.

Those like FMF who argue for the Obama administration's current counterinsurgency strategy argue themselves into a knot--we can't have security without development, they say, and we can't have development without security. The fact is that women's rights in these areas will best be secured through modernization, and the United States has had little success in advancing modernization through military occupation even if accompanied by enlightened development assistance -- partly because the US military presence is so polarizing and, as some experts argue, arouses local opposition. Modernization will best be achieved through strengthening the UN's hand in delivering both security and development assistance.

Nation Institute fellow and veteran war reporter Chris Hedges writes of counterinsurgency, "… Each generation of warriors thinks it has finally found the magic key to victory." But time and again, occupation and the killing of innocent civilians leads to increased recruitment for the enemy, the local population turning against the occupying power, and the cost in lives and treasure proving too great to sustain the support of the folks back home--and that's the case even in places that aren't "the graveyard of empires" as Afghanistan is.

July is already the deadliest month since the 2001 invasion -- "at least 56" NATO troops have died, including 30 US soldiers and 17 British soldiers. (And there are reports that the British public's support for the war is waning.) The New York Times reports that the main reason for the mounting casualties isn't the new offensive in Helmand Province but "the increasing power of roadside bombs employed by guerrillas in eastern and southern Afghanistan." And despite the Pentagon announcing a new strategy of protecting civilians as the top priority, the Afghan people continue to pay the heaviest price. As Hedges puts it, "Combat creates its own rules, and civilians are almost always the losers."

The administration asserts that we are there to prevent Afghanistan from once again becoming a safe haven for Al Qaeda. So does that mean we will send troops to Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Algiers, etc. --wherever else a decentralized Al Qaeda and terrorist network may roam?

As for the women and girls of Afghanistan, Ramdas reminds that "highly militarized societies in almost every instance lead to bad results for women. The security of women is not improved and in many instances it actually becomes worse." She points to increased prostitution, trafficking, and rape in Afghanistan since the war began. And Sonali Kolhatkar, co-director of the Afghan Women's Mission and Mariam Rawi (pseudonym) of the Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan, write:

"Today, women in the vast majority of Afghanistan live in precisely the same conditions, with one notable difference: they are surrounded by war. The conflict outside their doorsteps endangers their lives and those of their families…. We are told that the US cannot leave Afghanistan because of what will happen to women if they go. Let us be clear: Women are being gang raped, brutalized and killed in Afghanistan. Forced marriages continue, and more women than ever are being forced into prostitution--often to meet the demand of foreign troops…. The level of self-immolation among women was never as high as it is now. When there is no justice for women, they find no other way out but suicide."

Smeal and Cho write that they would "prefer that all US funding be spent on development aid, [but] cannot in good conscience advocate the immediate military pullout that some are suggesting." Actually, they can. Because a US withdrawal is not the abandonment of Afghan women and girls that they portray it to be, and US resources currently being spent on weapons and killing would do more to help the people FMF wants to help through the alternative approach the peace movement and many in this country and region are proposing.

Java's Ticking Time Bomb

Tom Allard, Cilacap, Central Java
July 25, 2009

HE WAS a mystery visitor dismissed by Jasmin, until last week, as a curious oddity. Every so often, a man would turn up at his next-door neighbour's house, walking briskly up to the front door. "He would always wear a motorcycle helmet all the way up to the entrance. He wouldn't take it off until he got inside," says Jasmin, a small-time farmer reclining on a bench on his front porch.

"The first time I saw him was just after Arina had her first child. I didn't think much of it, but when they found the bomb we were scared. When we heard our neighbour was a terrorist we were even more scared."

Arina Rahman is the suspected wife of Noordin Mohamad Top, the Malaysian-born terrorist who has had a leading role in suicide bombings in Indonesia stretching back to the first bombings that killed 202 people on Bali's Kuta tourist strip in 2002.

The man in the helmet was almost certainly Noordin himself, visiting the woman with whom he had two children while on the run from the biggest manhunt in Indonesian history.

For more than six years, Noordin has evaded capture. His remarkable elusiveness has, it appears, allowed him to pull off another of his signature devastating attacks.

He is the prime suspect as the mastermind of last week's audacious and meticulously planned bombings of two of Jakarta's most prestigious, and supposedly well-secured, luxury hotels.

Nine people, including the suicide bombers, died at the JW Marriott and Ritz-Carlton hotels. Among those murdered were a Dutch couple holidaying at the Ritz-Carlton, Evert Mokodompis, an Indonesian waiter whose wife gave birth to their son the day after he died, and three Australians and a New Zealander attending a breakfast meeting of Jakarta's business elite that was almost certainly targeted.

If all had gone to plan, the attacks would have caused far more carnage. Police now believe that an undetonated bomb, a laptop packed with explosives and bolts discovered in Room 1808 in the Marriott, was supposed to have gone off first, provoking a stampede of panicked guests towards the lobby, where the suicide bomber was to have then unleashed two bombs in the chaos.

The merciless killing of as many civilians as possible is the trademark of Noordin, an accountancy graduate who gravitated to a brand of violent Islamic extremism in Malaysia under the influence of the then exiled heads of Jemaah Islamiah, Indonesian clerics Abdullah Sungkar and Abu Bakar Bashir.

He fled to Indonesia in the wake of a crackdown on militants in Malaysia after the September 11 attacks.

He idolised Mukhlas, the now executed ringleader behind the first Bali bombings, and was infatuated with Osama bin Laden's jihad.

When Jemaah Islamiah's leadership, many of whom were appalled by the outcome of the first Bali bombing, decided to oppose mass-casualty attacks, Noordin struck out on his own and formed Tanzim Qaedat al-Jihad, also known as al-Qaeda for the Malay Archipelago.

"The extent of his actual communication with al-Qaeda is not clear, but he certainly seems infatuated, aping not only its name but also its materials and tactics," says Sidney Jones, the Jakarta-based terrorism analyst for the International Crisis Group.

The recently retired head of Indonesia's Detachment 88 counter-terrorism squad, Surya Darma, believes al-Qaeda was involved in last week's attacks, pointing to their sophistication, similarities with the hotel attacks in Mumbai and the requirement for significant financing.

"This kind of operation is not a domestic kind of work," Brigadier-General Darma told The Age. "This is al-Qaeda."

Whether al-Qaeda provided more than just an inspiration for the July 17 attacks remains to be seen. What is certain though, is that Indonesia has never quite seen terrorist attacks of this type before.

Most bombings in Indonesia have either focused on so-called soft targets such as Bali's bars or restaurants, with suicide bombers carrying bomb-laden packs, or used the brutal but somewhat ineffective strategy of hitting hard targets such as the Australian embassy with speeding car bombs.

In this case, the target was hard, the famously tightly secured hotels in Jakarta's upmarket business district, but the method was to use suicide bombers detonating themselves, which had, until last week, been used only for soft targets.

This was a surgical strike against foreigners and, specifically, Jakarta's elite expatriate community. The modus operandi meant that the terrorists could minimise the number of Muslim casualties and maximise the dead Westerners. Even militant Muslims baulk at the death of their fellow followers of Allah through terrorism.

Such an attack not only required recruits willing to kill themselves, but intimate knowledge of the hotel's security system. It needed intelligence on how to smuggle explosives past the metal detectors and about where and when the business meeting at which the Australians died was to be held, and an ability for the bombers to blend in with the guests at the five-star hotels.

It would have taken months of surveillance and the careful recruitment and placement of conspirators inside the hotel. In this case, it appears that a florist named Ibrahim, who had worked at the Ritz-Carlton for more than three years, was one of the insiders providing the valuable intelligence.

For Noordin — who constantly moves from one place to another, never staying anywhere for more than a few days — to have orchestrated the attacks while Indonesia's most wanted man was extraordinary.

"He must have nerves of steel to put up with it all … all the moving, all the close calls," says Greg Fealy, a former Office of National Assessments analyst now at the Australian National University. "But he endures it and he's continually planning new operations and putting together new cells."

While many Jemaah Islamiah members oppose his methods, they will still provide Noordin, reportedly a charismatic and persuasive man, with protection for a few days while he plans the next attack and opportunistically picks up new recruits as he travels.

In some cases he picks up mainstream Jemaah Islamiah members and persuades them to embrace terrorism. In another instance, he recruited individuals with a grievance against a local Christian minister converting Muslims and turned that sentiment into an all-embracing hatred of Westerners.

All the while, Noordin adheres to the strictest security arrangements. It is instructive that his wife, Arina, says she had no idea who he was, even though she was the daughter of one of his trusted operatives.

CERTAINLY, over a decade or more of jihadist activity of one type or another, Noordin has developed all the skills to put together an attack. He knows how to make bombs, source explosives, raise finances and persuade recruits to join his cause by using select passages of the Koran, arguing that Islam is under attack and must be defended at any cost and by any means.

And his ability to evade capture has enhanced his stature immeasurably.

As police investigate the mass murders at the hotels, it is in Cilacap, central Java, that they are concentrating much of their efforts. The residents of the district are hardly wealthy, but the web of villages connected by narrow roads and laneways, where locals tend rice paddies and small landholdings planted with cassava and shaded by coconut palms and banana trees, is a kind of lush Javanese rural idyll.

The homes are modest but well looked after, with many having neat hedges and patios adorned with bougainvillea. Very few women wear the hijab, and fewer still wear the chador or burqa favoured by Arina, Noordin's alleged wife.

It hardly feels like jihad central as school kids race their bikes and farmers take their produce to market.

Yet here, apparently, is Noordin's nest. Police have found a bomb identical to that used in the hotel blasts buried in the backyard of Arina's house in the village of Binangun. Her father, Baharudin, is on the run. A man alleged to have been a would-be suicide bomber trained by Noordin's group was picked up this week by police in Cilacap.

Saifuddin Zuhri, an Afghan jihad veteran and Noordin emissary who was arrested in Cilacap three weeks before the bombs went off, is believed to have been an important organiser in the long build-up to the attacks, making the seven-hour journey by train to Jakarta under the guise of having been given an all-expenses-paid scholarship to study Islam at a university there.

Jasmin, the neighbour, says Baharudin didn't interact with his neighbours. "He was at the house or the mosque. He didn't really talk with us at all, even though we have been neighbours for 20 years. We have really got to get rid of these people," he says. "They are very bad people if they did this terrorist bombing."

Jasmin's sentiments were widely shared in Cilacap, and reflect the broader sentiment across Indonesia about militant Islam.

In a country of 240 million people, it is a tiny minority of Indonesians who support mass-casualty terrorism, or are prepared to provide sanctuary for terrorists. Noordin's network of hardcore adherents is unlikely to be more than a few dozen people.

The broader JI movement that was so shockingly revealed by the first Bali bombings has all but ceased to exist, at least as a group that supports achieving an Islamic caliphate across South-East Asia by force of violence.

It has been crippled by arrests and fragmented by ideological disputes, and it is only Noordin's network that is considered to be an active exponent of terrorism, even if it continues to try to recruit from the old JI membership.

Even so, while 400 arrests of JI members shows Indonesia's success in cracking down on its terrorist wing, the fact that militant Islamic schools and preachers continue to go about their business unencumbered reveals a flaw in Indonesia's counter-terrorism strategy.

While they may not be pumping out suicide bombers and generally do not advocate the killing of civilians, they are producing graduates vulnerable to being taken the extra mile by recruiters such as Noordin.

More worryingly, members of the community seem to be prepared to provide sanctuary to mass murderers in the name of Islamic brotherhood, even if they don't approve of their actions. As Jakarta-based consultant James Van Zorge said this week: "Dangerous characters inside Jemaah Islamiah are treated with kid gloves, often with light jail sentences, and therefore given more opportunities to commit inhumane acts.

"At the same time, foreign nationals caught in minor violations of drug trafficking are left to rot in prison for the rest of their lives. Is vice a more heinous crime than cold-blooded murder?"

One of the most salient points about terrorists is perhaps the most obvious one, but one that is all too often ignored. Terrorist acts are conceived and executed to be brutal, shocking and inexplicable — in a word, terrifying — to convey an impression of a capability far greater than the actual power or support base of the organisation that undertakes them.

People are much more frightened by death that is sudden and violent than a demise that is more run-of-the-mill and less bloody. A tourist or visiting business person in Bali or Jakarta is still far more likely to meet misfortune through illness, a traffic accident or ordinary crime than to be caught up in a terrorist attack.

Yet given modern technology and relatively easy access to materials that can make bombs, it only requires 10 or so fanatics with a total lack of respect for human life and a preparedness to die to put together attacks such as those that occurred last week.

For Indonesia and its President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, the bombings could not have happened at a more heartbreaking moment.

Basking in international praise for peaceful elections held eight days earlier, the country was being lauded for its efforts to combat Islamic extremism and the fact there had not been an attack in four years.

Indonesia's efforts to unify its often fractious ethnic groups and to make headway against the pernicious problem of corruption have also been acclaimed of late.

Its economy, for so long a basket case, has been the best performing in the region, shrugging off the global economic crisis to be on track to record growth of about 4 per cent this year.

Tourism was booming in Bali, which had just been voted the "world's best island" by the upmarket Travel + Leisure magazine.

IF THE presidential election proved anything, it was that Islamic groups held much less sway over the masses than at previous polls.

Now Indonesia runs the risk of the newfound confidence in its future being reversed as investment dries up and tourists stay away.

In this context, it is perhaps understandable that Yudhoyono, relishing the opportunity to continue the steady reforms in his newly won second term, lost his cool and launched an astonishing rant hours after the attacks that all but blamed his political rivals for the hotel bombings, accusing them of being "draculas and angels of death" intent on "destroying the peace and security of the nation".

In the days since Yudhoyono's address to the nation, police investigations have shown those accusations to be as implausible as they originally seemed.

And it may also be that the intent of the terrorists to sow fear has not had the impact that they intended.

Jakartans have defiantly continued about their business, visiting the malls that are so often mentioned as targets.

Bookings at hotels have not been hit as hard as might be expected under the circumstances.

According to the chairman of the Bali Tourism Board, Ngurah Wijaya, the cancellation rates on the tourist island where two previous attacks have occurred have been "less than 1 per cent" over the past week.

"There will be some effect from the bombings, but we believe there will be other ways to make sure there is a minimal cost," said Wijaya. "Governor Made Pastika has called on all Bali citizens to be vigilant on security.

"We know we are still the best island in the world."

Such optimism may be well placed. Unless, that is, another terrorist attack soon follows.

Tom Allard is Indonesia correspondent.

Jul 23, 2009

Radical Cleric Bashir Claims CIA Staged Jakarta Bombings

Candra Malik

Radical cleric Abu Bakar Bashir. (Photo: Adek Berry, AFP)

Radical cleric Abu Bakar Bashir. (Photo: Adek Berry, AFP)

Radical Cleric Bashir Claims CIA Staged Jakarta Bombings

Solo. Hard-line Muslim cleric Abu Bakar Bashir on Wednesday blamed the US Central Intelligence Agency for Friday’s bomb attacks on two hotels in Jakarta.

“It’s the CIA, just like in the Bali bombings. The CIA directed the Mujahideen who wanted to take ‘jihad’ action,” said Bashir, who now leads the Jemaah Ashorut Tauhid, an umbrella group for Islamic groups advocating Shariah law.

Bashir left the Indonesian Mujahideen Council (MMI) he had founded and chaired for years after disagreements with other leaders of the group and founded the Anshorut Tauhid in September, 2008.

In his first public comments following Friday’s blasts at the JW Marriott and Ritz-Carlton hotels in Jakarta, Bashir said the CIA aimed to arouse hate against Islam, to get Islamic preachers arrested and Islamic study groups disbanded.

However, Bashir clarified, “I am not a bomb expert. I know nothing about it.”

The elderly cleric also reiterated that the Jemaah Islamiyah — a group that authorities said he had led and was an Al Qaeda-linked regional terror network responsible for bomb attacks in the past few years — did not exist.

“It’s wrong to say that Jemaah Islamiyah has been fragmented into two groups, the first being the original group and the second being the Jemaah Anshorut Tauhid. As far as I know, Jemaah Islamiyah is just an Islamic study group in Egypt,” he said.

Just like in the Bali bombings in 2002, Bashir was convinced that jihad networks in the country did not have the capability to make sophisticated bombs.

“Up till now, my opinion is that whoever believes that Mukhlas was the one who designed the Bali bomb is truly an idiot. The Bali bomb was a CIA design,” he said, referring to one of the three men convicted of masterminding the Bali bomb attacks and executed by firing squad.

He said the same thing applied to Friday’s attacks. “I think it’s not that easy to go in an out from the hotel carrying a bomb, even if it was brought in piece by piece. So, I have my own reason in saying that it must be the CIA’s plan to discredit Islam,” he said.

“The CIA, the US and Australia will not win. They actually fear us. Let’s see. Al Qaeda is just a small group but it terrifies them.”

However, Bashir also said that he did not condone the bombings. Citing the Koran, he said a war must be preceded by a formal declaration. “If they just exploded a bomb without any declaration of war, then it is not in accordance with ‘shariah’ or Islamic rule. That’s my opinion  . . . so they [the Mujahideen] could be wrong in their action,” he said.

He added that even in a war, civilians, especially women and children, must not be killed. “Even if they are kafir, they cannot be murdered. If they get involved, even in thought, they must be killed,” he said.

He added that the Al-Mukmin Islamic Boarding School that he cofounded in Ngruki, Central Java, was not a source of terrorists.

Two of the key Bali bombers were alumni of the school, as was the suicide bomber in the 2003 Marriot bomb attack.

Pursuing an Academic Edge at Home

Kimberly Kauer was worried about her 6-year-old daughter’s math skills. Her school doesn’t assign homework, and Ms. Kauer wasn’t sure which math concepts her daughter fully understood.

To quell her fears, Ms. Kauer started her daughter on an online educational program for young children called DreamBox Learning. DreamBox uses interactive games to teach math and analyzes users’ progress as they complete lessons.

“It was really well-geared to her age,” says Ms. Kauer, a 38-year-old stay-at-home mom in Emerald Hills, Calif. “They really tailored their questions to meet her needs.” After monitoring her daughter’s progress, Ms. Kauer concluded that her daughter was up to par for her age.

DreamBox is one of a number of companies, with names like SmartyCard, Brightstorm and Grockit, that are pitching a new generation of online educational products aimed at supplementing students’ education at home. The programs, which parents pay for by subscription, target learners from kindergartners to high-school seniors. The companies hope their interactive programs will draw students wanting to get ahead at a lower cost than hiring a professional tutor.

Tech companies began wooing consumers with educational products about a decade ago, but often with little success. Many of the early products had primitive technology. Today they offer such features as video and tools that allow collaboration. And children, familiar with sites like Webkinz and MySpace, are becoming more proficient at using the Web at younger ages.

The latest educational programs are generally created by teams of accredited teachers and often reviewed further by advisory teams that may include college professors of education. Still, while some earlier online programs have proved effective at raising children’s comprehension of academic subjects, the latest sites haven’t been extensively studied.

A Free Trial

Many of the programs offer feedback on a child’s progress, so parents can judge its usefulness for themselves. In choosing an educational program, “I’m more inclined to go with something that is aligned with state and national standards,” says Leticia Barr, a technology magnet coordinator and teacher for an elementary school in Maryland’s Montgomery County. She recommends starting with a free trial of the program. Parents should watch how their child interacts with the program to get a sense of whether it is appropriate.

DreamBox focuses on delivering individualized math instruction. As learners finish their lessons, answers are analyzed taking into account a problem’s difficulty, how quickly a question was answered, lesson pacing and other factors. Lessons are customized based on the user’s answers. DreamBox, founded this year, has mainly focused on the home market, but says it now is also selling to schools. Subscriptions for home users are $59.95 for six months.

Playing for Points

SmartyCard, launched in March, involves children in educational games to learn about math, social studies, writing and other subjects. Parents purchase SmartyCards, which hold points that are unlocked when a child successfully completes a lesson. Kids can use the points to play Webkinz, Club Penguin and other sites, or to redeem for goods like Nintendo Wii games and DVDs. The company says the site, launched in March, has 200,000 registered users.

Some sites focus on getting students ready for tests like the SAT. At Grockit, students can take practice tests while collaborating online with other users, typically in groups of five. After each question, users can discuss via an internal instant-messaging system how they arrived at their answers. Another site, Brightstorm, also offers courses for students in advanced placement courses.

Among other sites, GoGo Lingo uses animation, humor and casual game play to teach young children basic Spanish nouns, adjectives and verbs, but doesn’t focus on teaching grammar. The site, aimed at 3- to 7-year-olds, plans to add other languages in the future.

And Indian Math Online is a Web-based math program for K-12 students that is based on the national academic standards of India. A team of teachers based in India creates the content for the site.

The online educational industry has been getting a big boost from venture capital firms. Last year, about $1 billion was invested in learning technology companies, according to Ambient Insight, a market research firm focusing on education and technology. That’s up from $850.6 million invested in 2007.

Blended Instruction

Recent research suggests online instruction can be effective for older students. The Department of Education examined 46 studies conducted between 1996 and July 2008 that compared online classes, mostly at the college level, with traditional courses. It found that blended instruction, which combines online and face-to-face instruction, is more effective than pure face-to-face teaching. Researchers attributed the results in part to differing curriculums and the greater amount of time students spent on the online courses.

Still, the studies didn’t analyze online educational tools for home use. Julie Evans, chief executive of Project Tomorrow, an educational research group, says online instruction is limited by a lack of a suitable yardstick for measuring its effectiveness. Students in a traditional classroom are evaluated through standardized tests, she says. But this is a poor way to measure the effectiveness of Web-based education, partly because standardized tests can’t assess how well students learn from each other through collaboration, Ms. Evans says. “I don’t think we have seen good metrics to evaluate that true collaborative learning environment” of the Web, she says.

Marketing Small Businesses With Twitter

SAN FRANCISCO — Three weeks after Curtis Kimball opened his crème brûlée cart in San Francisco, he noticed a stranger among the friends in line for his desserts. How had the man discovered the cart? He had read about it on Twitter.

For Mr. Kimball, who conceded that he “hadn’t really understood the purpose of Twitter,” the beauty of digital word-of-mouth marketing was immediately clear. He signed up for an account and has more than 5,400 followers who wait for him to post the current location of his itinerant cart and list the flavors of the day, like lavender and orange creamsicle.

“I would love to say that I just had a really good idea and strategy, but Twitter has been pretty essential to my success,” he said. He has quit his day job as a carpenter to keep up with the demand.

Much has been made of how big companies like Dell, Starbucks and Comcast use Twitter to promote their products and answer customers’ questions. But today, small businesses outnumber the big ones on the free microblogging service, and in many ways, Twitter is an even more useful tool for them.

For many mom-and-pop shops with no ad budget, Twitter has become their sole means of marketing. It is far easier to set up and update a Twitter account than to maintain a Web page. And because small-business owners tend to work at the cash register, not in a cubicle in the marketing department, Twitter’s intimacy suits them well.

“We think of these social media tools as being in the realm of the sophisticated, multiplatform marketers like Coca-Cola and McDonald’s, but a lot of these supersmall businesses are gravitating toward them because they are accessible, free and very simple,” said Greg Sterling, an analyst who studies the Internet’s influence on shopping and local businesses.

Small businesses typically get more than half of their customers through word of mouth, he said, and Twitter is the digital manifestation of that. Twitter users broadcast messages of up to 140 characters in length, and the culture of the service encourages people to spread news to friends in their own network.

Umi, a sushi restaurant in San Francisco, sometimes gets five new customers a night who learned about it on Twitter, said Shamus Booth, a co-owner.

He twitters about the fresh fish of the night — “The O-Toro (bluefin tuna belly) tonight is some of the most rich and buttery tuna I’ve had,” he recently wrote — and offers free seaweed salads to people who mention Twitter.

Twitter is not just for businesses that want to lure customers with mouth-watering descriptions of food. For Cynthia Sutton-Stolle, the co-owner of Silver Barn Antiques in tiny Columbus, Tex., Twitter has been a way to find both suppliers and customers nationwide.

Since she joined Twitter in February, she has connected with people making lamps and candles that she subsequently ordered for her shop and has sold a few thousand dollars of merchandise to people outside Columbus, including to a woman in New Jersey shopping for graduation gifts.

“We don’t even have our Web site done, and we weren’t even trying to start an e-commerce business,” Ms. Sutton-Stolle said. “Twitter has been a real valuable tool because it’s made us national instead of a little-bitty store in a little-bitty town.”

Scott Seaman of Blowing Rock, N.C., also uses Twitter to expand his customer base beyond his town of about 1,500 residents. Mr. Seaman is a partner at Christopher’s Wine and Cheese shop and owns a bed and breakfast in town. He sets up searches on TweetDeck, a Web application that helps people manage their Twitter messages, to start conversations with people talking about his town or the mountain nearby. One person he met on Twitter booked a room at his inn, and a woman in Dallas ordered sake from his shop.

The extra traffic has come despite his rarely pitching his own businesses on Twitter. “To me, that’s a turn-off,” he said. Instead of marketing to customers, small-business owners should use the same persona they have offline, he advised. “Be the small shopkeeper down the street that everyone knows by name.”

Chris Mann, the owner of Woodhouse Day Spa in Cincinnati, twitters about discounts for massages and manicures every Tuesday. Twitter beats e-mail promotions because he can send tweets from his phone in a meeting and “every single business sends out an e-mail,” he said.

Even if a shop’s customers are not on Twitter, the service can be useful for entrepreneurs, said Becky McCray, who runs a liquor store and cattle ranch in Oklahoma and publishes a blog called Small Biz Survival.

In towns like hers, with only 5,000 people, small-business owners can feel isolated, she said. But on Twitter, she has learned business tax tips from an accountant, marketing tips from a consultant in Tennessee and start-up tips from the founder of several tech companies.

Anamitra Banerji, who manages commercial products at Twitter, said that when he joined the company from Yahoo in March, “I thought this was a place where large businesses were. What I’m finding more and more, to my surprise every single day, is business of all kinds.”

Twitter, which does not yet make money, is now concentrating on teaching businesses how they can join and use it, Mr. Banerji said, and the company plans to publish case studies. He is also developing products that Twitter can sell to businesses of all sizes this year, including features to verify businesses’ accounts and analyze traffic to their Twitter profiles.

According to Mr. Banerji, small-business owners like Twitter because they can talk directly to customers in a way that they were able to do only in person before. “We’re finding the emotional distance between businesses and their customers is shortening quite a bit,” he said.

Judge Says New York Is Unfair to Minority Firefighter Recruits

New York City used tests that discriminated against black and Hispanic applicants to the Fire Department and had little relation to firefighting, a federal judge in Brooklyn ruled on Wednesday, dealing a blow to the administration of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg.

“These examinations unfairly excluded hundreds of qualified people of color from the opportunity to serve as New York City firefighters,” wrote Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis of Federal District Court in Brooklyn, referring to two tests administered in 1999 and 2002.

The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by the Justice Department in 2007 after a federal complaint by the Vulcan Society, an association of black firefighters, led to an investigation into the Fire Department’s hiring practices.

The judge said he would determine later what remedies to require of the city. They could include payment of lost wages, retroactive seniority for some minority employees and affirmative action hiring. Noting that the court had ruled against the city in past decades in lawsuits brought over its hiring practices, Judge Garaufis wrote that even as the city’s black and Hispanic population had increased, “the overwhelmingly monochromatic composition of the F.D.N.Y. has stubbornly persisted.”

Like firefighting forces in several other big cities, New York’s has remained disproportionately white, despite pressures and efforts to diversify. According to the city’s Law Department, at the end of May, roughly 3 percent of the 11,529 firefighters were black, and about 6 percent were Hispanic. Federal census estimates put each group at roughly 27 percent of the city’s population.

“If there was any doubt that the city did have problems with its hiring process, it’s now been decided that in fact they do,” said Darius Charney of the Center for Constitutional Rights, one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs. “Now it’s hard for them to argue that they in fact are not discriminating.”

But city lawyers argue that the suit covers only tests no longer in use, and that their recent efforts to integrate the department are bearing fruit.

“Through extensive and persistent outreach, the F.D.N.Y. increased the number of minorities who took and passed the firefighter exams,” Georgia Pestana, chief of the Law Department’s labor and employment division, said in a statement.

Since the city began administering a new test in January 2007, the statement noted, racial minorities now comprise 38 percent of the candidates on the passing list; 33 percent of the top 4,000 on that list, who are most likely to be offered a job; and a third of the most recent graduating class of probationary firefighters.

It is unclear how a recent United States Supreme Court decision in a case from New Haven will shape efforts to determine a remedy. In that case, the court found that white firefighters who scored well on a promotional exam on which black firefighters had fared poorly were subjected to racial discrimination when the city threw out the results. Additionally, the court found that the possibility of a lawsuit from minority firefighters was not enough to justify ignoring the test results. That will make it harder for employers to discard results in the future, even if they have a disproportionately negative effect on members of a given racial group.

Last week, when Mr. Bloomberg testified at Senate confirmation hearings for Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee — who had joined a federal appeals court decision on the New Haven case that the Supreme Court ruling reversed — he volunteered his thoughts, saying that he disagreed with New Haven’s approach.

“I really do believe that that’s a better way to solve the diversity problem, which does affect an awful lot of fire departments around this country,” he said, “rather than throwing out tests and thereby penalizing those who passed the test.”

Judge Garaufis addressed the Supreme Court decision in his ruling, arguing that the New Haven case did not raise the legal question that the New York case did: whether the city’s use of the exams “actually had a disparate impact upon black and Hispanic applicants for positions as entry-level firefighters.”

Lawyers for the city did not say whether they would appeal the decision or seek a settlement, but if the ruling holds, the city could end up paying tens of millions of dollars, Mr. Charney said. The administration faces another phase in the suit to determine whether the discrimination was intentional, which could open the door to paying damages.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs said they hoped that the city would negotiate, and take the opportunity to diversify the force.

“I think this has the potential to very quickly change the demographics of the Fire Department, which has been something that’s been a long time coming,” said Dana Lossia, a lawyer for the Vulcan Society. “Really what this decision says is, the exams you were using don’t pick the best-qualified people. What they really don’t do is pick the people who would best protect the city.”

Extremist Ideas Survive Crackdown in Indonesia

JAKARTA, Indonesia — The Indonesian government’s crackdown on militant Islamic groups has been widely praised in recent years, particularly by the United States. Proof of its success rested in the fact that, after annual terrorist attacks earlier this decade, none had taken place in nearly four years.

But as a clearer picture has begun emerging of Friday’s coordinated suicide bombings at the JW Marriott and Ritz-Carlton hotels here, terrorism experts and some Indonesian officials are focusing on what they describe as weaknesses in Indonesia’s antiterrorism campaign. Although the authorities have arrested hundreds of militants and severely weakened Jemaah Islamiyah, the Southeast Asian terrorist network, they have had much less success in uprooting the culture that breeds extremism.

The authorities have failed to aggressively check the radical clerics, Islamic schools or publishing houses that allow extremists to recruit and raise money for their operations, these experts said. Even moderate, politically powerful religious leaders, who are against violence, oppose any perceived government interference in their affairs. And as democracy has become entrenched since the fall of President Suharto a decade ago, the authorities have appeared hesitant to use tactics that may recall the era of military rule.

“The bombings should be a catalyst for Indonesia to develop a more comprehensive approach,” said Rohan Gunaratna, head of the International Center for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. “They’ve been too focused on catching operators when they need to be tougher in actually preventing terrorism. They should take the boxing gloves off.”

The police have still not arrested anyone in the attacks, which killed seven people, including six foreigners, and wounded 50 more. On Wednesday, the police released sketches of two men suspected of being the suicide bombers and who were initially counted among the victims. Nanan Soekarna, a spokesman for the national police, said that DNA tests showed that the remains of neither of the suspected bombers matched a man named Nur Said, a militant whom the local news media had identified as one of the suicide bombers.

On Wednesday, investigators also detained a woman identified as Ariana Rahma, who is believed to be married to Noordin Muhammad Top, the prime suspect in the attacks, the local news outlets reported. She is said to be the daughter of the head of an Islamic boarding school in Cilacap, Central Java, that was raided last month. Investigators in that raid discovered bomb-making materials identical to those used Friday, the police have said.

The authorities have said that the bomb-making methods and the nature of the attacks indicated strongly that they were the work of Mr. Noordin, a Malaysian extremist who is believed to be behind the attacks earlier this decade. He was once a senior official in Jemaah Islamiyah and is the most wanted fugitive in Southeast Asia. Many extremist groups operating in Indonesia are said to have ties to him.

Though Mr. Noordin has evaded capture over the years, the Indonesian authorities have greatly disrupted Jemaah Islamiyah’s leadership. Once a network with operations throughout Southeast Asia, experts said, it now survives mostly in Indonesia in loosely affiliated small groups. The Indonesian government has also run a much-praised program in certain prisons that works to persuade Islamic militants to give up extremism.

But experts said that the authorities had been reluctant to rein in clerics and schools that had allowed extremists like Mr. Noordin to continue operating.

“On the law enforcement side, the achievements have been certifiable,” said Sidney Jones, an expert on Islamic terrorism at the International Crisis Group’s branch here in Jakarta. But Ms. Jones said that with an estimated 50 schools with ties to Jemaah Islamiyah, fugitives were sheltered, new recruits were found and money was raised.

“These places remain nodes of communication that are critical to keeping the network alive,” she said. “Everybody knows where these schools are, but there’s been a sensitivity in dealing with them because people don’t want to see Islamic education stigmatized.”

Islamic schools, called “pesantrens” here, have long played a central role in many Indonesian communities. Only a few are said to espouse violent tactics. But the schools, which are politically powerful, have long resisted greater government scrutiny.

“It would be very difficult to start questioning ulamas from these schools,” said a senior Indonesian counterterrorism official, referring to Islamic scholars at the schools and speaking on the condition of anonymity because he was not allowed to speak to the media. “Even moderate Indonesians would react negatively against that.”

The official said that sensitivity about carrying out any measure with a tinge of the pre-democratic Suharto era also complicated investigators’ activities. While permits were needed to publish books in the past, publishers of radical ideology are now flourishing in Indonesia and account for the biggest source of such thought in Southeast Asia.

“Since democratization, we’ve been in a conundrum,” the official said. “Do we start banning books?

“We’re conscious that we have not eradicated the deeper problems in the last five years,” the official added.

Mr. Gunaratna, of Nanyang Technological University, said Indonesia needed to adopt tougher antiterrorism laws, like those in Singapore and Malaysia, which allow suspects to be detained and questioned longer without bringing charges.

“That’s the reason there has been no attack inside Singapore or Malaysia,” he said. “Since democratization, some members of the Indonesian elite have the misguided view that these measures are antidemocratic.”

Clinton Warns North Korea and Myanmar May Be Sharing Nuclear Technology

PHUKET, Thailand — Stiffening the American line against Iran, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton warned Wednesday that the United States would consider extending a “defense umbrella” over the Middle East if the country continued to defy international demands that it halt work that could lead to nuclear weapons.

While such a defensive shield has long been assumed, administration officials in Washington acknowledged Wednesday that no senior official had ever publicly discussed it. Some of the officials said the timing of Mrs. Clinton’s remarks reflected a growing sense that President Obama needed to signal to Tehran that its nuclear ambitions could be countered militarily, as well as diplomatically.

It also signified increasing concern in Washington that other Middle East states — notably Saudi Arabia and Egypt — might be tempted to pursue their own nuclear programs for fear Iran was growing closer to realizing its presumed nuclear ambitions.

Mrs. Clinton later clarified her comments on Iran, delivered in advance of a regional meeting here, saying her warning that the United States might create such an umbrella did not represent any backing away from the Obama administration’s position that it must prevent Tehran from obtaining a bomb capability. But her words suggested that the administration was developing a strategy should all efforts at negotiation fail.

Her statement also came as Iran’s internal divisions and crackdown on post-election protests have complicated Mr. Obama’s pledge to “engage” Iran directly. Iranian officials have hinted that they will present new proposals on the nuclear program, and American officials have said their offers to negotiate stand.

Speaking during a televised town hall meeting in Bangkok, Mrs. Clinton said, “We want Iran to calculate what I think is a fair assessment, that if the U.S. extends a defense umbrella over the region, if we do even more to support the military capacity of those in the gulf, it’s unlikely that Iran will be any stronger or safer, because they won’t be able to intimidate and dominate, as they apparently believe they can, once they have a nuclear weapon.”

Asked about Mrs. Clinton’s comments, Sir Nigel Sheinwald, the British ambassador to the United States, said, “I don’t think it should be read as an acceptance of an Iranian nuclear weapon” but rather as a statement intended to “reassure our partners in the gulf.”

A senior White House official said he believed that Mrs. Clinton was speaking for herself and that she was, as she insisted, restating existing policy.

Mrs. Clinton’s invocation of a defense umbrella is reminiscent of the so-called nuclear umbrella that Washington extends to its Asian allies: implicitly, the promise of an American reprisal if they are attacked by nuclear weapons. But she did not use the term nuclear, and a senior State Department official cautioned that her remarks should not be interpreted to mean that.

After meeting the foreign ministers of China, Russia, Japan and South Korea, Mrs. Clinton also said that the United States would not offer new incentives to North Korea to return to negotiations. She said all of the other nations that had engaged in talks with North Korea in the past five years were united in demanding that North Korea undertake a “complete and irreversible denuclearization” before receiving any economic or political incentives from them.

She did not detail the steps that would be part of such a process, though she confirmed that they could include the disabling of the Yongbyon nuclear complex. Last year, North Korea began to dismantle that complex, where it runs a nuclear reactor and reprocess fuel rods to recover plutonium, but it vowed in June to restart production there.

The United States has had an uncharacteristically visible presence at this gathering of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or Asean. It signed a friendship treaty with Asean’s 10 members and called on one country, Myanmar, to release the imprisoned pro-democracy leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.

Israel’s minister of intelligence and atomic energy, Dan Meridor, told Israeli Army radio: “I was not thrilled to hear the American statement from yesterday that they will protect their allies with a nuclear umbrella, as if they have already come to terms with a nuclear Iran. I think that’s a mistake.”

Mrs. Clinton said she was trying to make even starker the choice Iran faced if it did not agree to abandon its program.

The administration has talked about bolstering the military capacity of Iran’s neighbors in the Persian Gulf so they could better meet the threat of a heavily armed Iran. It has also defended the proposed missile defense system in Eastern Europe as a potential shield against Iran.

“It faces the prospect, if it pursues nuclear weapons, of sparking an arms race in the region,” Mrs. Clinton said. “That should affect the calculation of what Iran intends to do, and what it believes is in its national security interest.”

On North Korea, Mrs. Clinton tried to project a united front, saying that China, Russia, Japan and South Korea had pledged to carry out the United Nations sanctions adopted in June against the North after its recent nuclear and missile tests.

Mrs. Clinton also reiterated concerns that North Korea might be transferring nuclear technology to Myanmar, which American officials refer to by its former name, Burma. She is to deliver a statement on North Korea on Thursday. In an excerpt provided to reporters, the tone remained unyielding, but the United States pledged to give North Korea “significant economic and energy assistance” if it undertook a verifiable denuclearization.

At the ministers meeting, Mrs. Clinton demanded that Myanmar release Mrs. Aung San Suu Kyi, who could face years in prison on charges that she violated her house arrest. “It’s so critical that she be released from this persecution that she has been under,” she said later at a news conference. “If she were released, that would open up opportunities, at least for my country, to expand our relationship with Burma, including investments in Burma.”

American officials met with diplomatic officials from Myanmar later to reiterate Mrs. Clinton’s demand.

Mark Landler reported from Phuket, Thailand, and David E. Sanger from Washington.

Increased U.S. Military Presence in Colombia Could Pose Problems With Neighbors

CARACAS, Venezuela — A plan to increase the American military presence on at least three military bases in Colombia, Washington’s top ally in Latin America, is accentuating Colombia’s already tense relations with some of its neighbors.

Venezuela, Ecuador and Nicaragua, which are members of a leftist political alliance that is led by President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela and backed by his nation’s oil revenues, have all criticized the plan, saying it would broaden the military reach of the United States in the Andes and the Caribbean at a time when they are still wary of American influence in the region.

Despite a slight improvement in Venezuela’s relations with the United States in recent months, Mr. Chávez has been especially vocal in lashing out at the plan. Speaking on state television here on Monday night, he put Venezuela’s diplomatic ties with Colombia under review, calling the plan a platform for “new aggression against us.”

Colombia’s foreign minister, Jaime Bermúdez, on Tuesday defended the negotiations, which are expected to produce an agreement in August, asking neighboring countries not to interfere in Colombia’s affairs. “We never expressed our opinion in what our neighbors do,” he said, pointing to Mr. Chávez’s attempts to strengthen ties with non-Western nations. “Not even when the Russian presence became known in Venezuelan waters, or with relations with China,” he added.

The United States has been negotiating the increase of military operations in Colombia in recent weeks, faced with Ecuador’s decision to end a decade-long agreement allowing E-3 AWACs and P-3 Orion surveillance planes to operate from the Manta Air Base on Ecuador’s Pacific Coast.

While American antidrug surveillance flights would sharply increase in Colombia, the world’s top producer of cocaine, the agreement would not allow American personnel to take part in combat operations in the country, which is mired in a four-decade war against guerrillas. A limit of 800 American military personnel and 600 American military contractors would also remain in place, officials involved in the talks said.

Still, depending on how the accord is put in place, American troop levels in Colombia could climb sharply. The United States currently has about 250 military personnel in the country, deployed largely in an advisory capacity to Colombia’s armed forces, William Brownfield, the United States ambassador to Colombia, said last week.

Colombia, which has already received more than $5 billion in military and antidrug aid from the United States this decade, has found itself isolated diplomatically as Mr. Chávez presses ahead with his efforts to expand Venezuela’s oil diplomacy while eroding American influence in the hemisphere.

Other countries chafe at Colombia for different reasons. Colombia’s diplomatic relations with Ecuador have soured since Colombian forces carried out a raid on a Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, rebel camp on Ecuadoran territory last year. A festering boundary dispute with Nicaragua has also made for tensions between Colombia and Nicaragua’s president, Daniel Ortega, an ally of Mr. Chávez.

But with Venezuela itself, Colombia remains locked in a complex game of interdependence.

Its sales of manufactured and agricultural goods to Venezuela remain resilient despite Mr. Chávez’s occasional outbursts directed at his ideological opposite, Colombia’s president, Álvaro Uribe. And faced with disarray in its oil industry, Venezuela relies on imports of Colombian natural gas, narrowing the possibility of a severe deterioration in ties between the two countries despite their sharply different views of cooperation with the United States.

U.S. Overlooks Kyrgyzstan Rights Abuses

BISHKEK, Kyrgyzstan — “You know what this is for,” Emilbek Kaptagaev recalled being told by the police officers who snatched him off the street. No other words, just blows to the head, then all went black. Mr. Kaptagaev, an opponent of Kyrgyzstan’s president, who is a vital American ally in the war in nearby Afghanistan, was found later in a field with a concussion, broken ribs and a face swollen into a mosaic of bruises.

Mr. Kaptagaev said that the beating last month was a warning to stop campaigning against the president, but that he would not. And so he received an anonymous call only a few days ago. “Have you forgotten?” the voice growled. “Want it to happen again?”

Mr. Kaptagaev’s story is not unusual in this poor former Soviet republic in the mountains of Central Asia. Many opposition politicians and independent journalists have been arrested, prosecuted, attacked and even killed over the last year as the Kyrgyz president, Kurmanbek Bakiyev, has consolidated control in advance of elections on Thursday, which he is all but certain to win.

“This is how the authorities rule in Kyrgyzstan,” said Mr. Kaptagaev, 52. “They use criminal methods to keep power.”

The United States has remained largely silent in response to this wave of violence, apparently wary of jeopardizing the status of its sprawling air base, on the outskirts of this capital, which supports the mission in Afghanistan. Indeed, the Obama administration has sought to woo the Kyrgyz president since he said in February that he would close the Manas base.

In June, President Obama sent a letter to Mr. Bakiyev praising his role in Afghanistan and the campaign against terrorism. Mr. Bakiyev allowed the base to stay, after the United States agreed to pay higher rent and other minor changes.

The lack of criticism of Mr. Bakiyev underscores how the Obama administration has emphasized pragmatic concerns over human rights in dealings with autocratic leaders in Central Asia. Under pressure in Afghanistan, the administration has feared alienating nearby countries whose support is increasingly important.

How to react to crackdowns like Mr. Bakiyev’s is a longstanding challenge for American diplomacy, here and around the world. Some American officials stress that rebuking governments over human rights is often ineffective because they lash back, and tighten things further.

The administration is mindful that a neighboring former Soviet republic, Uzbekistan, closed an American military facility there after American officials condemned an attack by the security forces in 2005 that killed hundreds of people. The Obama administration is trying to repair that relationship.

In the Kyrgyz elections on Thursday, opposition parties have rallied around the candidacy of a former prime minister, Almazbek Atambaev, but he is given little chance. Mr. Atambaev’s campaign manager, Bakyt Beshimov, said the Kyrgyz president drew strength from the American reluctance to speak out.

“This regime clearly understand that for the United States, democracy is not a priority, freedom of speech is not a priority,” Mr. Beshimov said. “They want peace, stability, air bases and regional security connected with Afghanistan.”

The Obama administration’s attempt to improve ties with Central Asia was underscored by a visit to the region this month by a senior diplomat, William J. Burns.

In Kyrgyzstan, Mr. Burns said at a news conference that the United States hoped for “fair and credible elections,” but he did not mention the treatment of the opposition or journalists.

Interviewed about the political situation, another State Department official, George A. Krol, said reports of violence “greatly disturb the department.”

“The United States doesn’t shy away from raising these issues with the Kyrgyz authorities,” he said.

The Kyrgyz president, Mr. Bakiyev, took office in 2005 after the Tulip Revolution — the third in what was seen at the time as a series of so-called color revolutions that offered hope of more democratic governments in the former Soviet Union.

Today, widespread disillusionment has set in, as in Ukraine and Georgia, which also had such upheavals.

Kyrgyzstan, with five million people, continues to have a more open political system and more open media than its hard-line neighbors in Central Asia. It is not a police state, and in general, only those who overtly challenge the government are hounded by the security services.

Even so, human rights groups have been taken aback.

“President Bakiyev has become infamous for even greater levels of corruption, authoritarianism and ineffective economic policies than his predecessor,” Freedom House, a human rights group, said in a new report.

In an interview at the presidential residence, Mr. Bakiyev dismissed such criticism. He said the security services were in no way persecuting the opposition.

He said he would be easily re-elected because the country was faring well despite the financial crisis, adding that opposition leaders were complaining that balloting would be falsified because they needed excuses for their lack of support.

“A strong opposition would not behave in that way,” Mr. Bakiyev said.

He said he was so confident that the elections would be honest that he had invited the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to monitor them. In a report in May, the organization, which has 56 member states, described concerns in Kyrgyzstan about “a criminalization of the political process.”

Mr. Bakiyev, asked about repeated attacks on journalists, said he doubted that the attacks were related to their jobs. He said the government would never try to silence the media.

“The only authorities that would take that step are ones who are afraid — afraid of journalists, afraid of openness, afraid of something that they want to hide,” he said. “I, as president, and the government of Kyrgyzstan fear absolutely nothing. There is no motive, there is no reason to hunt down journalists.”

Still, the bloodshed continues. This month, a journalist named Almaz Tashiyev died after being beaten by police officers, prosecutors said.

Syrgak Abdyldaev says he barely escaped that fate. In March, Mr. Abdyldaev, 47, a well-known journalist who has scrutinized the president’s political activities, was lured to a meeting by an anonymous caller who promised confidential information, and was attacked.

He was stabbed 29 times in the thigh, apparently in an effort to cause him to bleed to death. He survived after passers-by came to his aid.

“They wanted to make an example of me,” Mr. Abdyldaev said. “They wanted me to die in front of everybody. And then nobody — not a journalist, not anybody with a brain in his head — would dare write anything in the press.”

While he was hospitalized, his newspaper, The Bishkek Reporter, dismissed him. He was told it was too risky to keep publishing his work.